<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><article-meta>
<title-group><article-title>Redesigning the Wheat and Flour Supply Chain Network Under Uncertainty: A Case Study of Iran</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Safaei</surname><given-names>Sepehr</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rezapour Niari</surname><given-names>Maryam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">Department of Industrial Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.</aff>
</contrib-group>
<abstract><p>Supply Chains (SC) are increasingly affected by internal and external factors such as floods, earthquakes, war, and sanctions, creating significant uncertainty. The wheat and flour SC directly impacts household diets, and any disruption can lead to severe social, political, and economic consequences. This study presents a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model to minimize total costs. The model addresses a multi-product, multi-period problem that includes seven levels: farms, import points, silos (if construction), flour production plants, warehouses, and both essential and non-essential customers. To account for uncertainty, a two-stage stochastic programming approach is applied. In the first stage, the model identifies the optimal locations for silo construction. In the second stage, it optimizes the flow of goods across the network based on different scenarios. The results show the ideal locations for silo construction, the required import volume for each scenario, and flour shortages for non-essential customers, ultimately helping reduce dependency on imports for essential goods.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Supply chain network redesign</kwd><kwd>Wheat and flour integrated network design</kwd><kwd>Wheat import planning</kwd><kwd>Two-stage stochastic programming</kwd><kwd>Location and allocation</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Wheat and flour are central to the global food system, serving a crucial dietary function worldwide. The Supply Chain (SC) for these commodities is characterized by its fragility and complexity, influenced by a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Bread, a staple food for millions globally, represents the primary output of this SC. The consistent availability of a resource is paramount for global food security. Any disruption or shortage in its supply can precipitate widespread repercussions, impacting not only economic stability but also social and political equilibrium. The significance of the wheat and flour SC is paramount; even minor disruptions within it can precipitate considerable ramifications for both populations and governmental stability. Therefore, meticulous attention to the inherent challenges confronting this SC is imperative to safeguard a consistent food supply and avert severe socio-economic repercussions.</p>
<p>The crucial role of wheat and its derivatives as a national dietary food highlights the necessity for strategic planning for its Supply Chain Management (SCM) and provision. A foundational step toward refining management practices and facilitating informed decision-making, thereby boosting efficiency and productivity, involves comprehending the prevailing trends within this sector. In contemporary times, the nation&apos;s wheat requirements are fulfilled by combining internal cultivation and foreign procurement. Part of the domestically produced wheat is utilized by agriculturalists for rural bread production, seed purposes, and livestock feeding. The outstanding quantity is procured by the government through established guaranteed price mechanisms. Following its procurement, wheat is transferred to designated storage facilities. Imported wheat, which typically arrives at the nation&apos;s ports, is subsequently distributed throughout the provinces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref>. Each year, a significant quantity of grain is moved from purchasing centers and ports to these storage facilities, then to our mills and end-consumption points. The grain SC can be analyzed from both strategic and operational perspectives. Long-term decisions primarily involve selecting suppliers for imported grain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref>. Conversely, mid-term decisions focus on optimizing the quantity of imports, managing the flow of both domestic and imported wheat, developing storage strategies, overseeing the production of wheat-based products, and allocating resources to meet demand effectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1-2]</xref>.</p>
<p>Maintaining the stability of this vulnerable SC demands both rigorous monitoring and strategic foresight. A comprehensive understanding of various influencing factors, both internal and external, is crucial. These factors encompass natural disasters, geopolitical instabilities, economic sanctions, and global market price volatility. To enhance the overall resilience of this system, it is essential to incentivize domestic agricultural production of wheat, thereby mitigating reliance on imported grains for this critical commodity. As previously emphasized, these products are integral to food security, yet their import management is frequently underestimated. By fostering domestic production, we can effectively mitigate the risk of shortages and ensure a consistent supply of essential food products.</p>
<p>This research aims to develop a stochastic programming model for redesigning the wheat and flour SC. The primary objectives are to determine the optimal locations for constructing mills and to optimize the network flow. Notably, this study utilizes a two-stage stochastic modeling approach, which is an infrequent application within this specific research context. The main goals of the paper include:</p>
<p>I. Finding the best locations for mill construction to improve efficiency and lower transportation expenses. II. Catering to two categories of flour customers (essential and non-essential) and wheat customers to satisfy varied market needs; III. Focusing on the use of domestic wheat for mills while restricting imports to certain conditions to decrease reliance on foreign sources and bolster local production.</p>
<p>IV. Implementing the model in a real-world case study in Iran to evaluate its effectiveness in actual market scenarios.</p>
<p>V. Employing scenario-based stochastic programming, backed by historical data on wheat farming and current demand, to deliver the best solutions and mitigate risks; VI. Reducing expected costs and enhancing the sustainability of the SC; VII. Assessing the value of imports and identifying the most efficient import ports to cut expenses and enhance the distribution network&apos;s efficiency.</p>
<p>The present study proposes a comprehensive and practical solution to enhance the wheat and flour SC within Iran.</p>
<p>This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 provides a comprehensive overview of the theoretical background of the wheat and flour SC. Section 3 meticulously defines the problem and its underlying assumptions, subsequently presenting the deterministic mathematical model. Following this, a two-stage scenario-based stochastic model for the wheat and flour SC is formulated. Section 4 is dedicated to the analysis and discussion of the model&apos;s results. Finally, Section 5 offers managerial recommendations, presents conclusions, and suggests avenues for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2"><label>2</label><title>Literature Review</title>
<p>Research concerning wheat SC and its derivative products remains limited. To comprehensively address existing knowledge gaps, prior research studies have been categorized into three principal domains: 1) Agricultural food SCs (AFSCs), 2) uncertainty in SCs, and 3) wheat and flour SCM. Each section will provide an in-depth examination of its respective topic, offering insights into the current research landscape and identifying avenues for future investigation.</p>
<sec id="sec-3"><label>2.1</label><title>Agriculture Food Supply Chain (AFSCs)</title>
<p>A significant body of research has concentrated on the design and redesign of AFSC structures, primarily to enhance their efficiency and sustainability. For instance, Thakur et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">[3]</xref> developed a multi-objective Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) model to improve traceability within grain SCs, thereby minimizing food safety risks linked to the aggregation of different product lots. Their proposed model effectively optimized lot aggregation levels and blending costs, ensuring traceability and cost efficiency in grain handling operations. Moreover, Asgari et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-4">[4]</xref> investigated a practical, logistical challenge by employing integer programming to determine optimal inter-provincial wheat transportation volumes throughout the year, thereby offering an efficient solution for wheat SCM. In contrast, Craige et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-5">[5]</xref> highlighted the necessity of a comprehensive approach to biomass SC modeling, integrating key factors, such as site selection, harvesting, transportation, and processing costs, to evaluate the economic feasibility of various production methodologies.</p>
<p>Within the domain of AFSC distribution, Ghezavati et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">[6]</xref> developed a periodic planning model specifically designed to distribute fresh produce. This model, exemplified through a tomato SC case study, aimed to boost distributor profits. A key feature of their approach was optimizing logistical decisions by incorporating qualitative segregation of the produce. Cárdenas-Barrón et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">[7]</xref> developed a heuristic approach to address the selective and periodic inventory routing problem for collecting waste vegetable oil. Their method leveraged the Return On Assets (ROA) method to identify near-optimal solutions efficiently. This study proposes a comprehensive framework for supplier selection within the processed food industry, explicitly accounting for the impact of uncertainty. This approach integrates tactical production and distribution planning to maximize profits while simultaneously minimizing risks that could jeopardize service levels. This methodology underscores the inherent complexities of food SCM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-8">[8]</xref>.</p>
<p>Further studies have explored specific SC challenges across diverse contexts. For instance, Mogale et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10">[9]</xref> developed a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model to optimize transportation within India&apos;s Public Distribution System (PDS). This model aimed to efficiently move surplus grains to states experiencing deficits while also accounting for crucial factors, such as silo storage, vehicle preferences, seasonal procurement, and storage capacity. Gholamian et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref> developed an integrated model for the wheat SC, optimizing both long-term decisions (such as supplier selection and silo locations) and mid-term decisions (such as wheat distribution and blending). Building on this, Hosseini-Motlagh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-2">[2]</xref> introduced a novel model for redesigning a sustainable wheat SC. This model uniquely incorporates uncertainty while optimizing critical elements, including suppliers, silos, flour factories, and demand zones, to boost total network performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4"><label>2.2</label><title>Uncertainty in Supply Chain</title>
<p>Uncertainty is an inherent feature of SCs, and its influence on AFSCs is particularly pronounced due to the unpredictable character of environmental, market, and demand variables.</p>
<p>To improve the understanding and management of uncertainty, Yazdani et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11">[10]</xref> developed an enhanced approach to the fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method. This involved integrating interval fuzzy values into the Decision-Making Trial And Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, which was subsequently embedded within the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) framework. In addition, Jarernsuk et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-12">[11]</xref> developed mathematical programming models to optimize SCs for perishable goods. Their approach, which utilized possibilistic linear programming, aimed to enhance flexibility in managing fluctuations in unit prices and costs, thereby mitigating uncertainty within the SC. Their research underscores the intricate nature of uncertainty and its direct influence on decision-making processes within AFSCs. Certain studies have concentrated on strategic and tactical decision-making aimed at optimizing the performance of AFSCs. For instance, Meena et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13">[12]</xref> introduced a model incorporating both internal capabilities and deficiencies alongside external opportunities and risks, thereby offering a strategic viewpoint toward AFSCs. This model employed the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy-AHP methods to analyze and prioritize these factors effectively. In a separate study, Cruz et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-14">[13]</xref> introduced a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model designed specifically for the AFSC. Their research focused on capacity planning, technology selection, and product flow optimization to boost the Expected Net Present Value (ENPV). Govindan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-15">[14]</xref> reviewed diverse planning decisions and network structures within SCM. Their work specifically explored various optimization approaches employed to address uncertainty in SC networks. These techniques encompass recourse-based stochastic programming, risk-averse stochastic programming, robust optimization, and fuzzy mathematical programming. Additionally, Motevalli-Taher et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-16">[15]</xref> investigated AFSC sustainability by incorporating uncertainty in wheat demand and employing simulation to eliminate this challenge. Altogether, these studies provide significant insights into the theoretical and practical methodologies for managing uncertainty within AFSCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5"><label>2.3</label><title>Wheat and Flour Supply Chain</title>
<p>Wheat and its derivatives are currently recognized as a fundamental global food source. In a relevant case study, Hosseini Motlagh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-17">[16]</xref> investigated Iran&apos;s wheat SC and its associated organizations. Their research introduced a novel mathematical model aimed at optimizing the total cost of designing the wheat SC network. This model effectively integrated the wheat SC’s collection, production, inventory, and distribution phases. Furthermore, Asgari et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-4">[4]</xref> developed an optimization model for the monthly transportation of wheat from storage facilities to consumers, employing a combination of ILP and a genetic algorithm.</p>
<p>Gholamian et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref> developed an integrated wheat SC model incorporating various decision-making levels. This included technical decisions (such as supplier selection), strategic decisions (such as determining optimal silo locations), and mid-term decisions (such as wheat allocation and distribution). Their comprehensive model specifically addressed supplier selection, import quantity determination, wheat distribution, and the production of wheat-based products. Separately, Alberts et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-18">[17]</xref> investigated transportation disruptions during product movement from factories to the subsequent SC level (i.e., distribution centers). Their research focused on evaluating the efficacy of different strategies for mitigating transportation-related issues.</p>
<p>Flour, being the main derivative of wheat and a critical component in bread manufacturing, is of considerable importance within both the food and industrial sectors. In response, Gholamian et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-19">[18]</xref> developed an optimization model specifically for designing the flour SC network, particularly centered on strategic import decisions and mid-level allocation strategies. Motevalli-Taher et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-16">[15]</xref> developed a sustainable mathematical model for the bread SC. Their model simultaneously aimed to reduce economic factors, such as network costs, and environmental concerns, such as water consumption. Concurrently, it sought to boost job opportunities, thereby addressing a significant social dimension within the bread SC. Moreover, Djuric et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-20">[19]</xref> explored inflation control strategies in Serbia, specifically focusing on the impact of export restrictions and domestic consumption regulations for wheat and bread. Their research employed a Markov model to analyze the associated profit margins.</p>
<p>Trisna et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-21">[20]</xref> addressed the complexities of flour transportation by developing a comprehensive model for wheat and flour SC. Their research uniquely incorporated the concept of raw material substitution. The model specifically considered both supplier capacity and product demand under conditions of uncertainty. To formulate this intricate problem, they employed fuzzy integer non-linear programming and subsequently utilized a genetic algorithm to derive the best solution.</p>
<p>The distribution and production of bread, as a fundamental food, have also been a focus of academic inquiry. In this area, Kowalczyk et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-22">[21]</xref> conducted a comparative analysis of traditional and industrial methods for wheat harvesting and bread production. Their research culminated in developing a mathematical model for the wheat SC, encompassing all stages from wheat cultivation to the delivery of the final product. The model sought to optimize wheat production, imports, and water consumption while simultaneously reducing SC costs. Additionally, it incorporates decisions related to transportation, inventory, and silo establishment. In a related study, Zakaei et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-23">[22]</xref> introduced a foundational approach for strategic positioning and tactical allocation within a four-tier SC. They applied it to a real-world problem to boost a bread SC network. Concurrently, Dibani et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-24">[23]</xref> investigated the influence of consumer preferences and bread characteristics on demand.</p>
<p>The wheat and flour SC is fundamental to a nation&apos;s social and political stability, directly influencing citizens&apos; daily diets. Consequently, maintaining a stable SC is paramount, particularly amidst prevailing uncertainties. To thoroughly grasp the existing complexities and challenges within this domain, we undertook a comprehensive review of prior research, the findings of which are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. While a significant body of research addresses AFSCs, there is a notable scarcity of studies that incorporate uncertainty into their model formulations and optimizations. The majority of these investigations primarily deal with the broader SC dynamics, with limited exploration of silo construction and allocation decisions under uncertain conditions. This gap highlights a critical need for more sophisticated modeling approaches that merge both uncertainty and long-term infrastructure planning into tactical decision-making for the design of more robust SC.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Review of the related studies.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:5:66,181.2,537.1,755.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6"><label>3</label><title>Problem Definition</title>
<p>The wheat and flour SC is fundamental to both food security and economic stability. The model proposed in this research aims to optimize this critical SC by effectively managing its central components, encompassing farms, import points, silos, flour mills, warehouses, and various customer types. A core objective of the model is to identify the optimal locations for new silo construction strategically. Wheat, sourced from either domestic cultivation or international imports, undergoes initial transportation to silos for storage. Following storage, it is distributed to key consumers, including the agricultural sector and animal feed producers. Subsequently, the wheat is transferred to flour mills for processing into flour, which is then held in warehouses. Essential flour consumers, such as bakeries producing staple food products, receive priority in allocation. Any surplus flour is then directed to non-essential consumers, including confectionery manufacturers. A visual representation of this problem overview is provided in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Fig. 1</xref>.</p>
<p>This model extends beyond merely managing storage and distribution; it comprehensively optimizes the transportation of wheat from its points of origin, including farms and import locations, to silos and subsequently to flour mills situated across various regions. Since flour is a staple food, mills and warehouses are geographically dispersed nationwide. The model ensures that these facilities operate at maximum efficiency to meet demand. Furthermore, it assesses the necessity of constructing new silos to enhance overall storage capacity.</p>
<sec id="sec-7"><label>3.1</label><title>Assumptions</title>
<p>I. The proposed model operates over 9 years and involves multiple periods and products.</p>
<p>II. The construction of silos is scheduled for the first two years of these 9 years.</p>
<p>III. The initial network is designed without silos, and the model identifies the best locations for silos at the outset.</p>
<p>IV. It is assumed that all silos will be of medium size and will fulfill the minimum storage requirements. V. The model permits the establishment of up to two silos in each potential province.</p>
<p>VI. Shortages of flour for essential customers are not allowed, while shortages for non-essential customers are acceptable.</p>
<p>VII. The initial inventory level in warehouses is set to zero.</p>
<p>VIII. All domestically produced wheat must be utilized prior to any imported wheat being permitted.</p>
<p>IX. The supply priority within the network is arranged as follows: Wheat first, then essential flour, followed by non-essential flour.</p>
<p>X. All facilities, including silos, mills, and warehouses, are situated in the provincial capitals.</p>
<p>XI. Uncertainty factors involve import costs and crop loss rates at the farm level.</p>
<fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Overview of the problem.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:6:66,125.2,537.1,337"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8"><label>3.2</label><title>Notation and Model Formulation</title>
<sec id="sec-9"><title>Indicates</title>
<p>I The set of farms, i ∈ I.</p>
<p>J The set of siloes, j ∈ J.</p>
<p>K The set of mills, k ∈ K.</p>
<p>L The set of flour warehouses, l ∈ L.</p>
<p>P The set of import ports, p ∈ P.</p>
<p>A The set of essential flour customers, a ∈ A.</p>
<p>B The set of non-essential flour customers, b ∈ B.</p>
<p>W The set of wheat customers, w ∈ W.</p>
<p>T The set of periods, t ∈ T.</p>
<p>S The set of scenarios, s ∈ S.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-10"><title>Parameters</title>
<p>fit Management and operational cost of cultivation in farm i on period t.</p>
<p>fjt The cost of construction of silo j on period t.</p>
<p>fkt Management and operational cost of mill k on period t.</p>
<p>flt Management and operational cost of warehouse l on period t.</p>
<p>Cijt Transportation cost from supplier i to silo j on period t.</p>
<p>Cjkt Transportation cost from silo j to mill k on period t.</p>
<p>Cklt Transportation cost from mill k to warehouse l on period t.</p>
<p>Clat Transportation cost from warehouse l to essential flour customer a on period t.</p>
<p>Clbt Transportation cost from supplier i to non-essential flour customer b on period t.</p>
<p>Cjwt Transportation cost from silo j to wheat customer w on period t.</p>
<p>Cpjt Transportation cost from import port p to silo j on period t.</p>
<p>Capj Capacity of silo j.</p>
<p>Capk Capacity of mill k.</p>
<p>Capl Capacity of warehouse l.</p>
<p>Dwt The demand for wheat by customer w on period t.</p>
<p>Dat The demand for flour by essential flour customer a on period t.</p>
<p>Dbt Demand for flour by non-essential flour customers during period t.</p>
<p>Ωkt The cost of converting wheat into flour at mill k on period t.</p>
<p>Piit Cultivated area of farm i on period t.</p>
<p>Pipt Approved import capacity of wheat from import port p on period t.</p>
<p>αis Wheat loss rate in the field.</p>
<p>rr Conversion rate of wheat to flour in the mill.</p>
<p>cc Shortage cost for essential flour and wheat.</p>
<p>cb Shortage cost for non-essential flour.</p>
<p>SS The safety stock.</p>
<p>Ims Cost of importing wheat.</p>
<p>Pas The probability of scenario accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-11"><title>Variables</title>
<p>Xijts The amount of wheat shipped from farm i to silo j on period t.</p>
<p>X The amount of wheat shipped from silo j to mill k on period t.</p>
<p>jkts</p>
<p>X The amount of flour shipped from mill k to warehouse l on period t.</p>
<p>klts</p>
<p>Xlats The amount of flour shipped from warehouse l to essential flour customer a on period t.</p>
<p>X The amount of flour shipped from warehouse l to non-essential flour customer b on period t.</p>
<p>lbts</p>
<p>X The amount of wheat shipped from silo j to wheat customer w on period t.</p>
<p>jwts</p>
<p>Xpjts The amount of wheat shipped from import port p to silo j on period t.</p>
<p>Lats The amount of shortage of flour for essential flour customer a on period t.</p>
<p>L The amount of shortage of flour for non-essential flour customers during period t.</p>
<p>bts</p>
<p>Lwts The amount of shortage of wheat for wheat customer w on period t.</p>
<p>yjt Equal to 1 if the silo is chosen to be built in province j, 0 otherwise.</p>
<p>y Equal to 1 if the mill is chosen to be open in province k, 0 otherwise.</p>
<p>kts</p>
<p>ypts Equal to 1 if importing wheat is allowed from port p, 0 otherwise.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-12"><label>4</label><title>Mathematical Model</title>
<p>Safaei et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-39">[37]</xref> previously addressed this problem using a deterministic model. Building upon that work, the current study introduces a stochastic model to address the same problem.</p>
<p>Uncertainty in SC and logistics network design can be categorized into two primary categories: “Operational parameter uncertainty” and “network disruption uncertainty.”</p>
<p>Operational parameter uncertainty: This type refers to the typical fluctuations inherent in business processes, such as unpredictable shifts in demand or variations in the raw materials supply. These factors can significantly challenge SCM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40">[38]</xref>.</p>
<p>Network disruption uncertainty: This type encompasses infrequent events characterized by a low likelihood of occurrence but possessing substantial consequences for network performance. These disruptions can originate from natural disasters, such as floods and earthquakes, or human-induced factors, including wars and terrorist attacks. Such occurrences have the potential to impede the SC severely, thereby underscoring the critical need for strategic planning to bolster network resilience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40">[38]</xref>.</p>
<p>In contrast to numerous SCs where demand uncertainty significantly impacts operations, specialists in this domain contend that demand volatility is not a primary concern for this particular study. Given that wheat and flour are staple commodities, their consumption is directly correlated with per capita consumption, which is mainly dependent on population size. Consequently, the demand for these products remains relatively stable and is therefore not treated as an uncertain parameter within this model.</p>
<p>Instead, two principal sources of uncertainty considerably influence this SC:</p>
<p>I. Wheat loss rate in the field, which is affected by climatic conditions (such as flood, earthquake, and famine) and internal variables, culminating in fluctuations in domestic wheat production.</p>
<p>II. Import prices, which are influenced by global events (such as wars, climate conditions, economic sanctions, and geopolitical tensions), are a substantial uncertainty variable in the model.</p>
<p>Considering the various sources of uncertainty inherent in the system, this study adopts a two-stage stochastic programming approach. In the first stage, the model specifies the optimal locations for silos. Subsequently, the second stage focuses on optimizing flow allocation decisions across the SC under various scenarios. The objective function in this model aims to minimize the expected total cost, encompassing both operational expenses and initial capital investments across several uncertainty scenarios. The set S denotes the generated scenarios that capture the uncertainty in yield rates and import costs. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> outlines the six probable scenarios taken into account in this study.</p>
<p>Min Z1 = ∑ ∑ fit Piit + ∑ ∑ fjt yjt + ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas fkt ykts + ∑ ∑ flt</p>
<p>i t j t k t s l t</p>
<p>+ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Cijt Xijts + ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Cjkt Xjkts</p>
<p>i j t s j k t</p>
<p>+ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Cklt Xklts + ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Xklts Ωkt</p>
<p>k l t k l t</p>
<p>4 5 (1)</p>
<p>+ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Clat Xlats + ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Clbt Xlbts</p>
<p>l a t s l b t s</p>
<p>+ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Cjwt Xjwts + (∑ ∑ ∑ Cpjt + Ims) ∑ ∑ ∑ PasXpjts</p>
<p>j w t s p j t p j t 1 3 2</p>
<p>+ CC (∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Lats + ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Lwts) + cb ∑ ∑ ∑ Pas Lbts</p>
<p>a t s w t s b t s</p>
<p>The objective function, as formalized in Eq. (1), is designed to reduce anticipated total costs. These costs encompass both fixed and variable expenditures, such as management expenses per hectare of cultivated land, construction costs for new silos, operational and production costs for active flour mills, warehouse management costs, transportation costs across all network levels, import costs, and shortage costs.</p>
<p>Piit(1 − αis) ≥ ∑ Xijts , for all i, t,</p>
<p>yptsPipt ≥ ∑j Xpjts, for all p, t, s (3)</p>
<p>1 7 6 2</p>
<p>∑i Xijts + ∑p Xpjts ≥ ∑w X + ∑k X , for all j, t, s, (4)</p>
<p>jwts jkts 3 4 5</p>
<p>∑k X ≥ ∑a X + ∑b X , for all l, t, s, (5)</p>
<p>klts lats lbts</p>
<p>rr ∑j X ≥ ∑l X , for all k, t, s, (6)</p>
<p>jkts klts</p>
<p>∑l X = Dat − Lats, for all a, t, s, (7)</p>
<p>lats</p>
<p>∑ Xlbts ≤ Dbt − Lbts, for all b, t, s, (8)</p>
<p>∑j X = Dwt − Lwts, for all w, t, s, (9)</p>
<p>jwts 6 2 T 1</p>
<p>∑w X + ∑k X ≤ Capj ∗ ∑t=1 yjt, for all j, t, s, (10)</p>
<p>jwts jkts</p>
<p>rr ∑j X ≤ Capk, for all k, t, s, (11)</p>
<p>jkts</p>
<p>∑l X ≤ Capl, for all l, t, s, (12)</p>
<p>klts 6 2 T 1</p>
<p>∑w X + ∑k X ≥ SS ∗ ∑t=1 yjt, for all j, t, (13)</p>
<p>jwt jkt</p>
<p>∑t yjt ≤ 2, for all j, (14) ∑j yjt = k, for all t = 1, (15) ∑T−t1 yjt = 0, for all t, (16) ∑s Pas = 1, (17)</p>
<p>1 2 3</p>
<p>yjt, y , ypts ∈ {0,1}, for all i, k, p, t, (18)</p>
<p>kts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3</p>
<p>Xijts, Xjkts, Xklts, Xlats, Xlbts, Xjwts, Xpjts, Lats, Lbts, Lwts ≥ 0, for all i, j, k, l, a,</p>
<p>(19)</p>
<p>b, w, t, s.</p>
<p>The constraints within this mathematical model are formulated to augment the expected value of the wheat and flour SC across various scenarios. These constraints specifically address critical aspects of production, storage, transportation, and processing. Their inclusion ensures the efficient flow of wheat and flour while simultaneously sustaining SC balance and operational feasibility. Eq. (2) represents the farm output constraint for each scenario, which incorporates varying loss rates. This constraint stipulates that the volume of wheat supplied from each farm must be equivalent to the quantity of healthy wheat harvested from the agricultural land. Furthermore, the import constraint Eq. (3) ensures that the total volume of imported wheat does not surpass the annual import quota established by regulatory bodies. This phenomenon occurs when permitted within various scenarios. To maintain consistency in the quantity of goods entering and exiting each SC level, several flow balance constraints are incorporated. Eq. (4) ensures that the wheat dispatched from silos does not surpass the available stock. Similarly, Eq. (5) imposes a comparable constraint on flour, mandating that the outflow from storage cannot exceed the existing inventory level. Constraint regarding the wheat-to-flour conversion Eq. (6) establishes the connection between the quantity of processed wheat and the resulting flour produced, according to the conversion rate.</p>
<p>To satisfy customer needs, the supply of essential flour and non-essential flour and wheat, respectively, is governed by demand fulfillment constraints, Eqs. (7)-(9). Due to the restricted capacity of each SC facility, Eq. (10) guarantees that the total amount of wheat stored in a silo does not surpass its storage limit, provided that the silo was built in the current or prior periods. Moreover, Eq. (11) guarantees that the quantity of wheat processed in flour mills remains within their production capacity. Concurrently, Eq. (12) restricts the volume of flour stored in warehouses to their maximum capacities. To bolster SC resilience, a minimum inventory constraint Eq. (13) mandates that newly built silos sustain a safety stock equivalent to two months&apos; average consumption rate. Furthermore, the restriction on silo construction, Eq. (14), guarantees an even allocation of storage facilities throughout the provinces, adhering to government regulations. The initial condition constraint Eq. (15) specifies the number of silos present at the start of the first period. At the same time, Eq. (16) prohibits the construction of silos in the later stages of the planning timeline. The total probabilities for scenarios must not exceed one, and Eq. (17) regulates this. Ultimately, the nature of the decision variables is precisely defined by variable constraints Eq. (18) and Eq. (19). Eq. (18) designates binary variables (0 or 1), specifying whether a silo is constructed, a flour mill is operational, or wheat imports are allowed. Eq. (19) specifically mandates that all other variables, including quantities of wheat and flour, maintain continuous and non-negative values. Collectively, these constraints are designed to guarantee the efficient wheat and flour SCM, thereby achieving particular objectives, such as cost minimization, enhanced operational efficiency, and the secure and consistent supply of these crucial products.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Adopted scenarios.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,336,537.1,359.3"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>Scenario 1 High wheat loss rate in the field, high import prices 0.09 Scenario 2 High wheat loss rate in the field, typical import prices 0.21 Scenario 3 Typical wheat loss rate in the field, high import prices 0.15 Scenario 4 Typical wheat loss rate in the field, typical import prices 0.35 Scenario 5 Low wheat loss rate in the field, high import prices 0.06 Scenario 6 Low wheat loss rate in the field, typical import prices 0.14</p>
<sec id="sec-13"><label>4.1</label><title>Data Analysis and Research Findings</title>
<p>This study examines wheat cultivation across 31 provinces and imports through six key ports (Amirabad, Noshahr, Anzali, Chabahar, Bandar Abbas, and Imam Khomeini) in the country, covering the period from 2015 to 2023. The evaluation model encompasses the supply of essential and semi-essential flour and wheat. For computational analysis, this model was coded and solved utilizing the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) optimization software. All experiments were executed on a system with 8 GB of RAM and an Intel Core i7-7500U processor.</p>
<p>Given the unavailability of precise data, this study provided approximate yet realistic cost comparisons for each section. Over nine years, the total projected cost, encompassing wheat imports, domestic cultivation, flour production, multi-stage transportation, and silo construction, is estimated to be approximately 94.681 billion USD. The detailed expenditures for each analyzed scenario are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Results for scenario-based model.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,650.3,537.1,755.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>Given wheat&apos;s pivotal role in the diet of the Iranian population, the model initially prioritized silo construction in all provinces within the first year. By the second year, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Fig. 2</xref>, an additional eight silos were built in various provinces. The rationale underpinning these decisions is detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>.</p>
<fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>The geographical view of province selection for the construction.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,326.7,537.1,598.2"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>Had the model been configured to supply only non-essential customers, relying solely on safety stock policies and the current factory and warehouse capacities, it would have necessitated the construction of a second silo in 11 provinces. This scenario aligns with the observations made by Safaei et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-39">[37]</xref> in their research. Conversely, if the model aimed to serve essential customers exclusively, a total of 33 silos would suffice for all provinces. As depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Fig. 3</xref>, the model demonstrated a complete reliance on domestic wheat production in Scenarios 1, 3, and 5. Conversely, imports played a pivotal role in the SC within the even-numbered scenarios. In Scenario 2, imports constituted the majority of the supply due to a high rate of wheat loss.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Reasons for selecting provinces for building the second silo.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:66,704.3,537.1,755.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>importing port and is one of the most populated provinces in the country.</p>
<p>Tehran It is really critical for the capital province. Additionally, it is the most populous province of Iran.</p>
<p>Khuzestan The leading wheat producer in the country includes one import point.</p>
<p>Sistanobalochestan It consists of an importing point.</p>
<p>Kerman Shah One of the largest wheat producers in the country and in the vicinity of Kerman Shah, one of the largest wheat producers.</p>
<p>Gilan It includes an importing point and also the provider of wheat for the north east of the country’s flour production.</p>
<p>Lorestan Its proximity to Kermanshah and Khuzestan—both major wheat producers, with Khuzestan also serving as an import point—and to Isfahan, one of the country&apos;s most densely populated provinces Mazandaran It includes two importing point.</p>
<p>As illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>, the ports of Amirabad and Imam Khomeini are identified as the principal entry points for wheat imports into Iran, consistently processing the highest volumes. Conversely, Bandar Abbas and Anzali handle the lowest quantities of imported wheat. Notably, the aggregate volume of wheat imports from Iran&apos;s northern and southern regions demonstrates approximate parity.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>The import volume varies across different ports.</p></caption><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>To determine the amount of wheat imported in each scenario.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:66,216.5,537.1,409.6"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>As expected, the model consistently prevented shortages of essential goods. In the odd-numbered scenarios, the model strategically opted for shortages in non-essential goods, a decision driven by the lower cost of such shortages compared to the combined expenses of importing and distribution. Notably, Scenario 1 exhibited the most significant shortage, primarily attributed to a high rate of wheat loss at the farm level and elevated import prices. Conversely, the volume of wheat imports remained stable across Scenarios 2, 4, and 6. All supporting data for these observations are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>The shortage volume varies across scenarios.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:66,717.3,537.1,755.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tab7"><label>Table 7</label><caption><p>The shortage volume varies per year.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:66,660.2,537.1,696.2"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-14"><label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The present research presents a model designed to optimize the wheat and flour SC network. The model&apos;s core function is to determine the optimal quantity of wheat to be imported from various international sources, while simultaneously ensuring the maximal utilization of domestic wheat production. By incentivizing and facilitating increased local wheat cultivation, this model effectively contributes to reducing reliance on imports for this critical grain. The model additionally enhances flour production efficiency and optimizes product distribution across various SC tiers, all while effectively managing uncertainty. The core objective of this model is to satisfy demand at the lowest possible cost, even when confronted with challenging conditions across diverse scenarios. The analysis incorporates multiple variable costs, specifically those associated with wheat cultivation, imports, flour production, transportation, and potential shortages. The model is implemented using GAMS software, thereby precluding the necessity of employing heuristic methods. This study reveals that about 60% of the total SC costs are attributable to distribution, production, transportation, and shortages. The remaining 40% of the costs are associated with silo construction. From a strategic perspective, 40% of the total costs are linked to long-term decisions, whereas 60% pertain to operational expenses. These cost calculations were performed over nine years, offering a comprehensive understanding of the SC&apos;s cost structure.</p>
<p>The second aspect of silo construction and distribution focuses on strategically establishing facilities to supply wheat for flour production across all provinces. This distribution plan is crucial for defining the service area of each silo. Despite the considerable transportation distances for some silos, the model&apos;s design strategically identifies which provinces, particularly those equipped with two silos, will serve as primary wheat suppliers, thereby ensuring a stable supply network. Consequently, the model recommends the construction of 39 silos for optimal operational efficiency within the SC.</p>
<p>Regarding import strategies, the model demonstrated a clear divergence based on scenario characteristics. In odd-numbered scenarios, characterized by elevated transportation and import costs, the model opted to forego imports and instead manage shortages for non-essential customers. Conversely, in even-numbered scenarios, the decision to import was directly contingent upon the domestic production level. Analysis reveals that the shortages observed in odd-numbered scenarios significantly exceeded those in even-numbered scenarios. Notably, 2015 exhibited a substantially higher shortage volume compared to other years, primarily attributable to the incomplete construction of silos. In contrast, subsequent years experienced relatively consistent levels of shortages. Amirabad Port, situated in northern Iran, and Imam Khomeini Port, located in the south, are determined as the principal import hubs. Wheat imports constitute less than 15% of the total supply, significantly mitigating reliance on foreign sources. This ratio specifically pertains to essential goods, with a minor proportion allocated to non-essential items. This presents a worthy opportunity for private enterprises to supply non-essential flour to the food industry.</p>
<sec id="sec-15"><label>5.1</label><title>Managerial Suggestions</title>
<p>In Iran, exceptionally low fuel costs incentivize the selection of longer transportation routes for goods. However, this preference leads to considerable environmental consequences stemming from the extended travel distances. Conversely, elevated global fuel prices diminish the economic viability of exporting goods. Consequently, it would be more beneficial for managers to meticulously monitor transportation distances and prioritize the optimization of exports to enhance both operational efficiency and environmental sustainability. Iran&apos;s bread consumption significantly exceeds the global average, presenting considerable challenges for food security and resource management. To lessen this reliance, a pragmatic strategy would involve promoting and emphasizing alternative food products. This approach could help diversify national consumption patterns, bolstering food security and fostering more balanced dietary options.</p>
<p>To ensure the stability of the SC, particularly concerning wheat and flour, the establishment of long-term contracts with business partners is strongly advisable. Such agreements would offer enhanced flexibility and facilitate more efficient decision-making during crises, guaranteeing a consistent supply of essential goods and minimizing disruptions within the SC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-16"><label>5.2</label><title>Future Research</title>
<p>For future research, it would be beneficial to incorporate sustainability factors into the evaluation framework. Additionally, integrating various wheat qualities into the model could enhance the realism of the findings and more accurately reflect real-world conditions. Further, expanding the SC network to involve additional facilities at multiple echelons could culminate in long-term cost savings by lowering both tactical and operational expenditures, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the SC.</p>
<p>Due to specific constraints in the current study, facilities were hypothetically centralized within provincial capitals. For future research, it would be advantageous to investigate shorter time intervals and disaggregate the study into more specific geographical units, such as individual provinces or municipalities. This approach would enhance the practical applicability of the research and yield more valuable insights for real-world implementation, thereby facilitating the crucial transition from theoretical frameworks to practical solutions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-17"><title>Funding</title>
<p>This research received no external funding.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-18"><title>Data Availability</title>
<p>Sufficient data is available upon request.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-19"><title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="ref-1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Gholamian, M. R., &amp; Taghanzadeh, A. H. (2017). Integrated network design of wheat supply chain: A real case of Iran. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 140, 139–147. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.038">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.038</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M., Samani, M. R. G., &amp; Saadi, F. A. (2020). A novel hybrid approach for synchronized development of sustainability and resiliency in the wheat network. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 168, 105095. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105095">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105095</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Thakur, M., Wang, L., &amp; Hurburgh, C. R. (2010). A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing cost and traceability in bulk grain handling. Journal of food engineering, 101(2), 193–200. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.07.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.07.001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Asgari, N., Farahani, R. Z., Rashidi-Bajgan, H., &amp; Sajadieh, M. S. (2013). Developing model-based software to optimise wheat storage and transportation: A real-world application. Applied soft computing, 13(2), 1074–1084. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.002</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Craige, C. C., Buser, M. D., Frazier, R. S., Hiziroglu, S. S., Holcomb, R. B., &amp; Huhnke, R. L. (2016). Conceptual design of a biofeedstock supply chain model for eastern redcedar. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 121, 12–24. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.019</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Ghezavati, V. R., Hooshyar, S., &amp; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017). A Benders’ decomposition algorithm for optimizing distribution of perishable products considering postharvest biological behavior in agri-food supply chain: a case study of tomato. Central European journal of operations research, 25(1), 29–54. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0418-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0418-3</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., González-Velarde, J. L., Treviño-Garza, G., &amp; Garza-Nuñez, D. (2019). Heuristic algorithm based on reduce and optimize approach for a selective and periodic inventory routing problem in a waste vegetable oil collection environment. International journal of production economics, 211, 44–59. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.026</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Amorim, P., Curcio, E., Almada-Lobo, B., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D., &amp; Grossmann, I. E. (2016). Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty. European journal of operational research, 252(3), 801–</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-9"><label>814</label><mixed-citation><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.005</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-10"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Mogale, D. G., Dolgui, A., Kandhway, R., Kumar, S. K., &amp; Tiwari, M. K. (2017). A multi-period inventory transportation model for tactical planning of food grain supply chain. Computers &amp; industrial engineering, 110, 379–394. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.008</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-11"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Flynn, B. B., Koufteros, X., &amp; Lu, G. (2016). On theory in supply chain uncertainty and its implications for supply chain integration. Journal of supply chain management, 52(3), 3–27. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12106">https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12106</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-12"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Yazdani, M., Wang, Z. X., &amp; Chan, F. T. S. (2020). A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL, QFD and fuzzy values. Soft computing, 24(16), 12449–12468. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04685-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04685-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-13"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Jarernsuk, S., &amp; Phruksaphanrat, B. (2019). Supply chain for perishable agriculture products by possibilistic linear programming. 2019 IEEE 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications (ICIEA) (pp. 743–747). IEEE. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2019.8715221">https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2019.8715221</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-14"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Meena, S. R., Meena, S. D., Pratap, S., Patidar, R., &amp; Daultani, Y. (2019). Strategic analysis of the Indian agri-food supply chain. Opsearch, 56(3), 965–982. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00380-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00380-5</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-15"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cruz, L., Pires-Ribeiro, J., &amp; Barbosa-Póvoa, A. (2019). Design and planning of agri-food supply chains. Computer aided chemical engineering, 46, 55–60. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50010-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50010-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-16"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Govindan, K., Fattahi, M., &amp; Keyvanshokooh, E. (2017). Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. European journal of operational research, 263(1), 108–141. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-17"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Motevalli-Taher, F., Paydar, M. M., &amp; Emami, S. (2020). Wheat sustainable supply chain network design with forecasted demand by simulation. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 178, 105763. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105763">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105763</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-18"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M., Samani, M. R. G., &amp; Abbasi Saadi, F. (2021). Strategic optimization of wheat supply chain network under uncertainty: A real case study. Operational research, 21(3), 1487–1527. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00515-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00515-y</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-19"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Mogale, D. G., Kumar, M., Kumar, S. K., &amp; Tiwari, M. K. (2018). Grain silo location-allocation problem with dwell time for optimization of food grain supply chain network. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 111, 40–69. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.004</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-20"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Albertzeth, G., Pujawan, I. N., Hilletofth, P., &amp; Tjahjono, B. (2020). Mitigating transportation disruptions in a supply chain: a cost-effective strategy. International journal of logistics research and applications, 23(2), 139–158. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1648640">https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1648640</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-21"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gholamian, M. R., Taghanzadeh, A., &amp; others. (2019). An integrated bread flour supply chain model considering import, storage, production and distribution planning. Iranian journal of agricultural economics and development research, 50(1), 65–78. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ijaedr.ut.ac.ir/article_71311_d5f768bc3db779204c6ecc6c0123f018.pdf">https://ijaedr.ut.ac.ir/article_71311_d5f768bc3db779204c6ecc6c0123f018.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-22"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Djuric, I., &amp; Götz, L. (2016). Export restrictions--Do consumers really benefit? The wheat-to-bread supply chain in Serbia. Food policy, 63, 112–123. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.07.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.07.002</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-23"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Trisna, T., Marimin, M., Arkeman, Y., &amp; Titi, C. S. (2020). Fuzzy multi-objective optimization for wheat flour supply chain considering raw material substitution. International journal of industrial engineering and management, 11(3), 180. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ijiemjournal.uns.ac.rs/images/journal/volume11/IJIEM_263.pdf">https://ijiemjournal.uns.ac.rs/images/journal/volume11/IJIEM_263.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-24"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kulak, M., Nemecek, T., Frossard, E., &amp; Gaillard, G. (2016). Eco-efficiency improvement by using integrative design and life cycle assessment. The case study of alternative bread supply chains in France. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 2452–2461. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.002</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-25"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Zokaee, S., Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., &amp; Sadjadi, S. J. (2017). Robust supply chain network design: An optimization model with real world application. Annals of operations research, 257(1), 15–44. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1756-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1756-6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-26"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>De Boni, A., Pasqualone, A., Roma, R., &amp; Acciani, C. (2019). Traditions, health and environment as bread purchase drivers: A choice experiment on high-quality artisanal Italian bread. Journal of cleaner production, 221, 249–260. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.261">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.261</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-27"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Tanksale, A., &amp; Jha, J. K. (2016). An effective heuristic for multi-period multi-foodgrain inventory transportation problem in India. INFOR: Information systems and operational research, 54(4), 355–379. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2016.1231498">https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2016.1231498</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-28"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Chávez, M. M. M., Sarache, W., &amp; Costa, Y. (2018). Towards a comprehensive model of a biofuel supply chain optimization from coffee crop residues. Transportation research part e: Logistics and transportation review, 116, 136–</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-29"><label>162</label><mixed-citation><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.06.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.06.001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-30"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Essien, E., Dzisi, K. A., &amp; Addo, A. (2018). Decision support system for designing sustainable multi-stakeholder networks of grain storage facilities in developing countries. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 147, 126–130. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.019</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-31"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Naderi, B., Govindan, K., &amp; Soleimani, H. (2020). A Benders decomposition approach for a real case supply chain network design with capacity acquisition and transporter planning: wheat distribution network. Annals of operations research, 291(1), 685–705. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03137-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03137-x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-32"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Navazi, F., Sazvar, Z., &amp; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2023). A sustainable closed-loop location-routing-inventory problem for perishable products. Scientia Iranica, 30(2), 757–783. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2021.55642.4353">https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2021.55642.4353</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-33"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Babazadeh, R., &amp; Shamsi, M. (2024). Green design of regional wheat supply chains under uncertainty. Scientia Iranica, 31(22), 2166–2180. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_22787_bff8aad352c09563872ea914452b138c.pdf">https://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_22787_bff8aad352c09563872ea914452b138c.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-34"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Seydanlou, P., Jolai, F., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., &amp; Fathollahi-Fard, A. M. (2022). A multi-objective optimization framework for a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network in the olive industry: Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms. Expert systems with applications, 203, 117566. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117566">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117566</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-35"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Olfati, M., &amp; Paydar, M. M. (2023). Towards a responsive-sustainable-resilient tea supply chain network design under uncertainty using big data. Socio-economic planning sciences, 88, 101646. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101646">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101646</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-36"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Yousefi-Babadi, A., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., &amp; Govindan, K. (2023). Redesign of the sustainable wheat-flour-bread supply chain network under uncertainty: An improved robust optimization. Transportation research part e: Logistics and transportation review, 176, 103215. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103215">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103215</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-37"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Rahbari, M., Arshadi Khamseh, A., &amp; Sadati-Keneti, Y. (2024). Resilience strategies in coping to disruptions of wheat supply chain caused by the Russia--Ukraine war crisis: Case study from an emerging economy. Kybernetes, 53(10), 2984–3018. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1728">https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1728</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-38"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Sharifi, E., Amin, S. H., &amp; Fang, L. (2024). Designing a sustainable, resilient, and responsive wheat supply chain under mixed uncertainty: A multi-objective approach. Journal of cleaner production, 434, 140076. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140076">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140076</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-39"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Safaei, S., &amp; Rezapour Nari, M. (2024). A supply chain network design model for wheat and flour: Integrating domestic consumption, imports, storage,production, and distribution; case study Iran. 10th international conference on industrial and systems engineering, Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://civilica.com/doc/2119440">https://civilica.com/doc/2119440</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-40"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Farazmand, M., &amp; Pishvaei, M. S. (2018). Intermodal Transportation Network Design Model Under Uncertainty (Case Study: Cement Transportation in Iran). Industrial management perspective, 8(3), 115–139. (In Persian). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_87168_314ee3dc8082dde85fb3fda04700a0d7.pdf">https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_87168_314ee3dc8082dde85fb3fda04700a0d7.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>