<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><article-meta>
<title-group><article-title>Multi-Objective Uncertain Mathematical Programming for Urban Water Supply System</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Daneshmand-Mehr</surname><given-names>Maryam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abolghasemian</surname><given-names>Milad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">Department of Industrail Engineering, La.C., Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran.</aff>
<aff id="aff2">Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Strategic Technologies, Ayandegan University, Tonekabon, Iran.</aff>
</contrib-group>
<abstract><p>Water supply management is essential in social development, ecosystem sustainability, and environmental management. For this purpose, this study presents a planning framework for city water supply management based on water security indicators in Rasht city, Guilan province, to formulate and implement a water security policy using mathematical modeling. In this article, a dual-purpose model is used to manage water supply, minimizing costs, water shortages, and waste. Also, in the proposed model, water consumption in the urban area is treated as uncertain using a fuzzy approach. According to the results, evaluating the accuracy and validity of the model for the water supply system from different water resources shows that increasing treatment capacity and water resources in Guilan province can reduce treatment costs and shortages, and reduce wastewater. Regarding the parameters that positively affect the amount of input water, it is necessary to implement appropriate systems to control input water and manage these valuable resources. Eventually, forecasting the amount of shortage in the studied area over the next 100 years indicates a linear trend: the shortage increases in each period due to increased population and decreased precipitation.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Water resource management</kwd><kwd>Optimization</kwd><kwd>Wastewater management</kwd><kwd>Water supply</kwd><kwd>System dynamics</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Water resources are of great importance for socioeconomic development, food production, and environmental conservation. Thus, its exploitation is a vital matter for the development of humanity, Ghannem et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref>.</p>
<p>Water is considered a vital substance for human life and social development. The problem of water resource management has worsened due to rapid economic development. The shortage of water resources significantly limits social and economic development and threatens drinking water security. For this reason, the water shortage crisis is increasing due to climate change and human activities. In addition, demand for water resources has gradually increased with the development of industrial and agricultural production and the social economy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-2">[2]</xref>.</p>
<p>Furthermore, population growth, urbanization, climate change, mismanagement of water resources and water distribution systems, and inappropriate programming increase water stress in many countries worldwide. Although optimization of water distribution systems and integrated water management techniques have been conducted in many cities, no integrated study has been found regarding urban water systems, programming, and management <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">[3]</xref>. Due to population growth, limited water resources, and other pressures on urban water systems, urban water management has become a primary concern for urban policymakers in recent years, as they seek to develop efficient management solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-4">[4]</xref>. Thus, solving network design problems has become an interesting topic in the field of wastewater management and water security because of increased population, resource shortage, environmental concerns, and the increasing need for sustainable solutions for future policy plans, especially in the areas where the demand for wastewater treatment has increased significantly due to high immigration, rapid industrialization, and tourism activities to make this topic more critical and dynamic Demirel et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-5">[5]</xref>. Following the long-term effects of urban water services is a background for the future and a critical scientific foundation for the sustainable development of systems Shiu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">[6]</xref> since the appropriate exploitation of water resources is considered as an effective measure to realize the optimal allocation of water resources and can effectively decrease the regional water resource shortages, flood disasters, and other social problems, and play a key role in supporting the strategic development of water resources. Water supply for urban supply systems is a global effort and a big challenge for water resource managers in large urban areas. Water supply requires integrated management of water quantity and quality, and adaptation of the system to land use and climate change in the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">[7]</xref>.</p>
<p>Current water security models assess a system&apos;s security status using indicators of quantity, quality, and compliance. Moreover, existing studies address this topic using mathematical optimization-based approaches that require substantial computational effort. In addition to mathematical optimization studies, an alternative approach based on the system dynamics method is proposed in this study to evaluate the complex dynamic and nonlinear structure of water and wastewater network design problems and water supply since the developed framework can provide an evaluation method for the water life cycle in the long term in a dynamic way to evaluate the temporal changes and the effects to deal with the challenges related to water security. The proposed SD simulation model has been designed for a populated tourist spot in Guilan province, located in the north of Iran and the southwest of the Caspian Sea. Accordingly, the most significant innovation and unique contribution of this study are as follows:</p>
<p>I. Establishing a three-phase water supply system, including the processes of water production, distribution, and purification II. Creating a quantitative relationship in the urban water supply system and evaluating system performance based on it.</p>
<p>III. Providing integrated programming to determine the optimal status of water supply protocols and select the most appropriate water supply strategy based on various programming periods for policy makers.</p>
<p>IV. Establishing an optimal programming cycle for a real-world water supply system by combining the bi-objective mathematical model and system dynamics modeling methods.</p>
<p>V. Considering an uncertain value for the amount of water consumed in the time period to make the modeling closer to reality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2"><label>2</label><title>Literature review</title>
<p>Golpira and Tirkalaei <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-8">[8]</xref> evaluated the social and economic effects at different levels of environmental flow allocation in the Wei River basin in China using the systems dynamics model and VENSIM software. In this report, four methods were presented for social and economic growth, and four methods for environmental water allocation. The results indicated that the developed system dynamics model captures the system&apos;s dynamic behavior well in the studied area. Nepal and Teren <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">[9]</xref> addressed the use of the system dynamics method in simulating the cultivation pattern of the irrigation and drainage network on the right side of the Isfahan waterfall. The results revealed that maintaining or not maintaining the limit on the total area under cultivation in the base year yields the highest income relative to the cost. In addition, they used the VENSIM system dynamics model to simulate electricity production from the Karun 1, Karun 3, and Karun 4 hydroelectric reservoirs. The design steps involved defining the required decision variables, equations, and formulas to measure the energy production of the reservoirs. The results indicated that energy production in the Khorasan 1 reservoir, including the Karun 4 and 3 reservoirs, can increase by an average of 20% without significant changes to the evaluation criteria. Song et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10">[10]</xref> evaluated different scenarios for water resource allocation of Choghakhor dam using the system dynamics method. The VENSIM dynamic model was designed and implemented to utilize the water resources of the Choghakhor dam and meet downstream needs. In addition, the input amounts to the dam reservoir and evaporation from the dam reservoir were predicted using a SARIMA time-series model for the next 5 years. The results showed that the Choghakhor dam can supply the water needs of 1600 hectares of water-consuming lands in the most optimal state. In this regard, the amount of supply for agricultural and environmental needs is 83 and 95, respectively. Tian et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11">[11]</xref> used the PSO, genetic, and ant colony optimization algorithms to study wastewater network optimization. They concluded that the PSO algorithm can reach the optimal solution faster with fewer iterations. Zhu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-12">[12]</xref> developed domestic and industrial water demand models based on a bi-objective model to balance economic and environmental costs in an urban water supply system across three phases: water production, distribution, and treatment. Then, a system dynamics-based model is applied to test the performance of the water supply system under short-, medium-, and long-term programming scenarios. Yu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13">[13]</xref> studied stakeholder competition in the operation of a multi-purpose ecological reservoir to satisfy economic, social, and ecological needs. For this purpose, a multi-objective game-theoretic model was developed to determine water discharge over 10 days to satisfy the triple needs of water —electricity production, socioeconomic consumption, and the environment. Dimello et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">[7]</xref> proposed a new method for evaluating water security based on the ranking of pressure indicators, which apply to a drainage basin such as water demand, regular and random pollutants, drought, and environmental changes (e.g., the share of forest vegetation) according to risk assessment in terms of pressure characteristics such as severity, occurrence, and detectability. Dang et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-14">[14]</xref> formulated a multi-objective water resource allocation model to optimize efficiency and equity with sustainability (ecological river flow) as a constraint. For this purpose, the NSGA-II algorithm was used to extract Pareto solutions in a water resource allocation system. The results showed that Pareto solutions can show the opposite relationship between efficiency and equity in water resource allocation. Demirel et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-5">[5]</xref> proposed an alternative approach based on the system dynamics method to select a location for wastewater treatment facilities and to design wastewater treatment networks. The proposed SD simulation model was designed for an area in Antalya, Turkey. This model can determine the location and timing of constructing a new wastewater treatment plant and a public wastewater network for five areas in downtown, based on cost considerations during 2015-2040. Guilani et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-16">[15]</xref> provided a sustainable selection method for the location of water treatment facilities using the best-worst method. Moreover, this model selects appropriate technologies for the treatment plant, manages water leakage across the entire transmission network through renovation, and selects different transmission technologies. Based on the obtained results, the interaction of water and energy has received special attention in this network. Shiu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">[6]</xref> proposed a method for dynamic life cycle assessment that considers temporal changes and the challenges of water treatment facilities, based on life cycle assessment principles applied to system dynamics models. This model was then applied to a water treatment plant in the Kinmen Islands, Taiwan. The SD model can simulate long-term growth in water demand across the domestic, agricultural, livestock, and manufacturing sectors. Zhu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-17">[16]</xref> developed an integrated framework for climate change and analyzed its effects on social-environmental aspects across many areas, including wastewater treatment, energy transmission, waste management, land management, and ocean management. Heydari-Kushalshah et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-18">[17]</xref> presented a mathematical model for water supply management. The proposed model can minimize water loss and shortages in an urban area.</p>
<p>Based on the above literature review, the literature fails to present an appropriate optimization model for the effective management of urban water supply resources, given the area&apos;s conditions. Thus, introducing a water supply system that includes production, distribution, and treatment processes is recommended to establish a quantitative relationship within the urban water supply system and to describe system performance based on this relationship. Regarding the most significant advantage of this study, it has been conducted to strengthen water resources management through linear multi-objective mathematical modeling that accounts for factors affecting water supply in a high-rainfall province such as Guilan, Iran. Based on the presented modeling, total efficiency and economic benefits are achieved across the domestic, industrial, and agricultural sectors. As a result, the most significant research gaps are as follows:</p>
<p>I. A framework that tracks the optimal response to water supply protocols by changing the programming period according to an integrated method, and determines the most appropriate water supply strategy and programming period for policy makers.</p>
<p>II. Establishing a three-phase water supply system, which involves the processes of water production, distribution, and treatment.</p>
<p>III. Defining a quantitative relationship in the urban water supply system to measure the performance of the system according to this relationship.</p>
<p>IV. Defining an optimal programming period for a real-world water supply system by combining the bi-objective programming and system dynamics methods.</p>
<p>V. Presenting a multi-objective uncertain mathematical programming for the urban water supply system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3"><label>3</label><title>Method</title>
<p>This study focuses on the use of mathematical modeling and system dynamics. In this regard, a bi-objective mathematical model is presented to optimize water resources. This model can simultaneously minimize overall system and wastewater costs, which are primary challenges in water resource management. Also, in the proposed model, water consumption in the urban area is treated as uncertain using a fuzzy approach. Numerous efforts have been made to manage wastewater, but no satisfactory results have been achieved. This study, which focuses on Guilan province, a rainy province in northern Iran, presents a mathematical model that minimizes costs and wastewater use while returning water resources to the urban and rural water supply cycle. Guilan province is considered one of the few regions in Iran with abundant water. This province can serve as a model for greater productivity in water resources for other provinces in Iran.</p>
<sec id="sec-4"><label>3.1</label><title>Urban Water Supply System Structure</title>
<p>The water resources programming and management structure in the urban water supply system can be regarded as a multi-objective optimization problem due to multiple objectives, constraints, and highly diverse variables. For this purpose, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Fig. 1</xref> shows the general structure of the urban water supply system in the studied sector.</p>
<fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>The general model of the studied urban water supply system.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:4:66,624.9,537.1,778.6"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Fig. 1</xref>, three main sectors are involved in the intended urban water supply system. The first sector, the production sector, includes various water resources such as seawater, rainwater, imported water from neighboring countries, underground water reservoirs, and others. In addition to these water resources, the desalination unit operates in the production sector alongside other water sources to convert Caspian Sea water into drinking water. Further, the treatment unit there converts water from reservoirs, rain, imported water, and wastewater into drinking water. The second sector is the distribution network, or the water consumption sector, which serves two major groups of water resource subscribers: industrial and residential. Finally, the water used in the distribution sector is collected and transferred to the recovery (reproduction) and treatment sectors, so that a portion of it is returned to the consumption cycle (industrial and residential consumption), if possible. In this sector, there are water treatment plants and drinking water production plants. Part of the water entering the water treatment plants is poured into the sea without any special treatment. The other part is transferred to water production plants after treatment to provide water for the industrial and residential sectors. An inclusive urban water supply system for all types of residential and industrial consumption has a complex mechanism that requires a comprehensive, optimal management plan to achieve its critical goals. Since there is an optimization problem in the programming and management of urban water systems, a modeling optimization problem should be formulated within a standard structure to address it. The following section presents the mathematical model for optimal management and programming of the urban water system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5"><label>3.2</label><title>Mathematical Modeling of the Problem</title>
<p>This section explains the research assumptions, parameters, variables, and the objective functions and their constraints to introduce the mathematical model.</p>
<sec id="sec-6"><title>Assumption</title>
<p>The most significant hypotheses of this study are as follows:</p>
<p>I. The parameters are determined definitively.</p>
<p>II. The model is multi-period.</p>
<p>III. Every area includes the city and its subordinate villages.</p>
<p>IV. Water resources are considered constructed.</p>
<p>V. The construction of treatment systems is considered a variable.</p>
<p>VI. In addition to the construction cost, the treatment systems have a management fee per kilometer of water resources.</p>
<p>VII. Water supply resources have fees.</p>
<p>VIII. Energy consumption and its cost are considered for water resources and treatment systems.</p>
<p>IX. Wastewater and shortage are considered in the present model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7"><title>Symbolization</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> presents all the indices, parameters, and variables considered in the mathematical model.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Mathematical model symbolization.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:5:65.6,620.2,537.1,715.7"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>DEMit The amount of water consumption in area i in time t Uncertain FCJij Cost of water treatment system construction j in area i Deterministic FCKik Cost of water supply resource k in area i VCJj Cost of settling the water treatment system j EWit The amount of water resources entering the area i in time t CAPJij Capacity of water treatment system j in area i CAPKik Water resource capacity k in area i ENCj The amount of energy consumption for water treatment in the water treatment system j UENCj Cost of energy consumption per unit for water treatment in the water treatment system j ENCKk The amount of energy consumption in the water supply resource k UENCKk Cost of energy consumption per unit for the water supply resource k TCkji Cost of water transmission from water supply resource k to water treatment system j in area i Variables Type of Variables Xij Its value is 1 water treatment system j is constructed in area i; otherwise, it is Binary zero.</p>
<p>Ukji The amount of water transmission from water supply resource k to water Continuous treatment system j in area i Yik The amount of water resources available in water supply resource k in area i Zjt The amount of treated water in the water treatment system j at time t WWit The amount of wastewater in area i in time t LWit The amount of water shortage in area i in time t</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8"><title>Objective functions</title>
<p>The first objective function of the raised problem in Eq. (1) is to minimize the cost of water supply, including the energy cost, amount of energy consumption, and cost of constructing a treatment system, cost of managing water resources, the cost of managing the treatment system, and the cost of transmitting water resources. In addition, the second objective of the problem in Eq. (2) is to minimize wastewater and water shortage for the entire system, where wastewater is measured by demand and consumption, and the input determines the shortage.</p>
<p>I J I K J T J T</p>
<p>minz1 = ∑ ∑ FCJij . Xij + ∑ ∑ FCKik . Yik + ∑ ∑ VCJj . Zjt + ∑ ∑ ENCj . UENCj. Zjt</p>
<p>i j i k j t j t I K I J K</p>
<p>+ ∑ ∑ ENCKk . UENCKk. Yik + ∑ ∑ ∑ TCkji . Ukji,</p>
<p>i k i j k</p>
<p>minz2 = ∑ ∑ WW + LW . (2)</p>
<p>it it</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-9"><title>Constraints</title>
<p>∑ X = 1, (3)</p>
<p>ij</p>
<p>Ukji ≤ Xij, (4)</p>
<p>∑ U = 1, (5)</p>
<p>kji</p>
<p>Yik ≤ CAPKik, (6) Zjt ≤ CAPJij, (7) Zjt ≤ M. Xij. (8) WWit = EWit − DEMit, (9)</p>
<p>LW = DEM − ∑ Y , (10)</p>
<p>it it ik</p>
<p>∑ Z ≤ ∑ Y , (11)</p>
<p>jt ik j=1 k=1</p>
<p>Xij ∈ {0,1}, (12) Ukji ∈ {0,1}, (13) Yik ≥ 0, (14) Zjt ≥ 0, (15) WWit ≥ 0, (16) LWit ≥ 0. (17)</p>
<p>Based on Eq. (3), every treatment center can be constructed in a single area. Eq. (4) shows that the construction of those centers determines the transmission of resources from treatment centers. According to Eq. (5), water transmission from water resources to treatment centers is only significant in one area. In addition, Eq. (6) reveals the capacity limitation of water resources. Eq. (7) shows the limitation of the treatment center capacity. Eq. (8) indicates that if a treatment plant is present, it can include water resources. Furthermore, Eq. (9) addresses wastewater calculation in the system, and Eq. (10) considers shortage calculation in the system. Eq. (11) indicates that water resources in treatment centers cannot be more than the water resources in water resource systems. Eqs. (12) – (17) present the type of variables in the problem, which are binary integer and continuous (positive).</p>
<p>In this model, the amount of water consumption in the urban area (demand amount) is considered uncertain. Therefore, to make the model more closely aligned with the real world, it is formulated in a fuzzy form. To address data uncertainty, we intend to treat the demand parameter as realistically as possible while accounting for uncertainty. This hypothesis has been ignored in the basic model presented by Heydari-Kushalshah et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-19">[18]</xref>. In fact, we want to provide a plan to cover the unknown demand in the form of a chain. In this research, we assume that in a fixed period of time, the amount of water consumption in area i in time t (DEMit) is assumed equal to St. We assume that demand in period t is continuously uncertain and varies with actual conditions. Uncertainty in the water supply chain can arise for any reason, including decreased rainfall, the onset of the hot season, etc. This parameter is considered a non-deterministic distance[S ̃ − S ̂, S ̃ + S ̂].</p>
<p>t t t t</p>
<p>According to the uncertain space, like S , the bounded symmetric form S ̃ is S ̂ = ρS ̃ where S ̃ the estimated</p>
<p>k t t t t</p>
<p>value for the demand parameter is. In fact, S ̃ is the fluctuation rate of the demand parameter, and ρ &gt; 0 is the level of uncertainty. Therefore, the goal is to estimate a set of random demands to provide the most supply at the lowest possible cost. The main decisions in this case are estimating demand and determining its starting time. Therefore, we consider a binary variable Ziand variable yitfor each demand. For 1 ≤ ≤ , the value of Zi will equal 1 if the demand is met. Otherwise, it will be zero. For 1 ≤ t ≤ T and1 ≤ i ≤ I, the value of yitis equal to one if the demand for area i starts in period t. Otherwise, its value will be zero. Since each demand can only occur once in the planning horizon H, then we have:</p>
<p>Z = ∑ y , 1 ≤ i ≤ I; 1 ≤ t ≤ T; i = 1, … , I; t = 1, … , T. (18)</p>
<p>i it</p>
<p>Eq. (18) allows us to transform the variable Zilike a continuous variable. Because the independent variables in Eq. (18) are either 0 or 1, their sum is nonnegative. Now, if a demand is satisfied in period k, we can calculate yikvia the continuous variable (19).</p>
<p>yit = ∑ yit , 1 ≤ i ≤ I; 1 ≤ t ≤ T; i = 1, … , I; t = 1, … , T. (19)</p>
<p>t′=max {1,t+1}</p>
<p>Therefore, to account for the uncertain and unknown demand, the above equations are added to the proposed model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-10"><label>3.3</label><title>Problem Solving Method: Epsilon Constraint</title>
<p>The solution method in this study includes the exact method, which uses the epsilon-constraint algorithm. This section explains the algorithm, and the problem is solved using the epsilon-constraint method. In this regard, the first objective is considered the main objective, and the second objective is constrained to the upper limit epsilon and applied to the problem constraints. Based on the epsilon method, the multi-objective model&apos;s constraint is reduced to a single-objective model 18. In this method, one objective function is selected, and the other objective functions are converted into constraints based on the amounts determined by the decision maker or modeler. In addition, the problem is formulated as a single-objective linear programming model and solved using the linear programming method. The main advantage of the epsilon constraint is its applicability to non-convex solution spaces, since methods such as weighted objective combination lose efficiency in such spaces. The computational time of an algorithm is a significant feature for evaluating it. The use of the meta-heuristic algorithm leads to a sharp reduction in computational time, since one of the major weaknesses of algorithms based on exact search, including the epsilon method, is their high computational cost. A framework presented by Pirouz and Khoram <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-20">[19]</xref> is one of the modified versions of the epsilon constraint method. Abolghasemian et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-21">[20–22]</xref>, have recently recommended this version due to its two significant advantages. The smaller search space for finding non-dominant points is one of this method&apos;s advantages. Another advantage of this method is its shorter execution time than the original method. Based on this method, the single-objective optimization problem is solved for each objective, and then the step length is determined. Then, a set of appropriate points is generated. Finally, the single-objective optimization is solved and the Pareto frontier is estimated.</p>
<p>minf1(x),</p>
<p>fi(x) ≤ ei, (20)</p>
<p>x ∈ X.</p>
<p>The first objective in Eq. (18) is considered the main objective, and the second to n − th objectives are limited to the maximum value ei. In the epsilon constraint method, different solutions are obtained, which may not be effective by changing the values of ei. The problem can be solved by modifying the aforementioned model, known as the modified epsilon-constraint method. In this method, the previous equation is rewritten as Eq. (21).</p>
<p>minf1(x) − ∑ ϕisi,</p>
<p>fi(x) + si = ei, (21)</p>
<p>x ∈ X,</p>
<p>si ≥ 0.</p>
<p>Where si represents the auxiliary nonnegative variables and ϕi shows a parameter for the normalization of objectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-11"><label>3.4</label><title>Development of System Dynamics Model</title>
<p>The simulation using the system dynamics approach in this study involves the following steps:</p>
<sec id="sec-12"><title>Development of the simulation model</title>
<p>All key effective variables are specified in the cause-effect loop diagram and then converted into a flow diagram using VENSIM software to analyze the effective factors. Then, an integrated SD model is simulated based on the relationships between the variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-13"><title>Definition of cause-and-effect relationship</title>
<p>A cause-and-effect diagram is often used to indicate the dynamic interactions between system elements, with the positive and negative effects of each element on the others shown with (+) and (-) signs, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-14"><title>Drawing the flow diagram</title>
<p>The flow diagram is quantitative and depends on the definitions of certain variables for problem-solving. The variables used in the system dynamics in this study are those of the mathematical model, whose values are obtained by solving the model and entered as parameters in VENSIM. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> presents the cause-and-effect variables required for the system dynamics model.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>System dynamics model variables.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:8:66,157.6,537.1,281.3"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-15"><label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec-16"><label>4.1</label><title>Case Study</title>
<p>Urban water and wastewater companies were established in Iran with the approval of the Islamic Council on January 1, 1991. These companies aim to create and operate urban water facilities and collect, transfer, and treat wastewater within the legal limits of the cities in each province. The regional water companies already fulfilled the relevant tasks in part of the province and by municipalities in smaller cities. After the establishment of the urban water and wastewater company in Iran, these functions were transferred to the new company. The same tasks in the rural sector were assigned to the newly established rural water and wastewater companies on December 13, 1995. Before that, such services were conducted at the Jihad, construction, and health centers in the villages. By merging the urban and rural water and wastewater companies in March 2019, all service functions in cities and villages for the supply and distribution of sanitary and drinking water, as well as the collection, transmission, and treatment of wastewater, have been entrusted to the integrated water and wastewater companies. In general, water and wastewater companies are non-governmental, financially and legally independent, and governed by commercial law.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-17"><label>4.2</label><title>Results of Numerical Solution for the Model</title>
<p>This section presents the results of solving the model and its validation across different dimensions (small, medium, and large). For this purpose, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref> presents the problem&apos;s dimensions.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Dimensions of the problem and predetermined parameters.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:9:66,225.3,537.1,561.5"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>As observed, the problem dimensions change in each example above. An increase in dimensions affects the value of the objective functions and the calculation time, provided the modeling is conducted correctly. For this purpose, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> presents the objective function values and the calculated time.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Results of the mathematical model solution.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,417.1,537.1,756.2"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> presents the results from 20 examples, including the cost of water supply and the amount of wastewater. To check the model&apos;s accuracy, the results from the diagrams of these amounts are presented. For example, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Fig. 2</xref>, the cost of the entire system increases with the problem&apos;s dimensions, indicating the model&apos;s accuracy and validity. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Fig. 3</xref> shows the amounts of wastewater and the shortage. As a result, an increase in dimensions leads to a natural increase in wastewater and a shortage in the urban water supply system. Finally, the calculation time increases with increasing problem dimensions, which is another proof of the model&apos;s validity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Fig. 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>The amounts resulting from the cost in different dimensions.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,117.6,537.1,305.6"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>Waste water 3300000</p>
<fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>The amounts of wastewater in different dimensions.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,582.6,537.1,670.6"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>The amounts obtained from the calculation time in different dimensions.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,376.1,537.1,568.2"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-18"><label>4.3</label><title>Practical Results</title>
<p>Since the epsilon limit method has been introduced to solve the mathematical problem, the objective function values are calculated for different epsilon values and presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>. This model is solved using GAMS and CPLEX. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> presents different values of epsilon, and the objective functions are solved with these values. The values of the objective function show no significant change when increasing epsilon to a certain level. However, an increase in epsilon shows a considerable slope in the objective function values from some point onward, e.g., the first objective function. Such changes have indicated different slopes in the objective functions. Based on the obtained results, the feasible region and the improving vector of the objective functions were created for testing different values of epsilon. Accordingly, the significant changes in epsilon within the 50-900 interval were identified as the improving vector. Determining this interval indicates that the solution to the problem is outside the feasible region if epsilon is less than 50 or greater than 900. Thus, the epsilon value for searching the local optimum of the first objective function is set to 500, since the optimal solution occurs there. The optimal situation for the second objective function occurs at epsilon = 150, and the optimal solution range is 150-500 epsilon. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> presents the results of solving the model with a step length of 50 for epsilon.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>The results of solving the model using the epsilon constraint method.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:66,366.1,537.1,756.2"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-19"><label>4.4</label><title>Sensitivity Analysis</title>
<p>This section provides a sensitivity analysis of the problem&apos;s significant parameters and compares the effectiveness of each parameter on the objective function values for the cost of water supply, the amount of wastewater, and the shortage. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Tables 6</xref> and 7 present the results of this sensitivity analysis.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>Comparison of parameters affecting the urban water supply cost.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:53.5,98.5,544.2,237.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref>, the parameters of Input water and capacity have the most significant negative effect on the change in water supply cost percentage. Thus, it worsens the water management solution. While other parameters have a positive effect and improve the solution. The effectiveness of the capacity and input water is 6.6% and 6.1%, respectively. In other words, increasing capacity can reduce costs by 7% while increasing the amount of input water by 6.1%, leading to a reduction and improvement in the solution. The capacity and the amount of input water are the only decreasing parameters, and the others have an increasing effect.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab7"><label>Table 7</label><caption><p>Comparison of the parameters affecting the wastewater and shortage.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:53.5,581.6,542,693.3"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">Table 7</xref>, the amount of input water and capacity reduces shortages and wastewater. At the same time, treatment cost and demand have the most significant effect on the shortage, at 2.5% and 2.4%, respectively. It should be noted that reducing input water by 2.5% reduces the shortage by 2.5%, and reducing capacity by 2.2% reduces the shortage by 2.2%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-20"><label>4.5</label><title>System Dynamics</title>
<p>This section evaluates the long-term performance of the urban water supply system dynamics model. Predetermined parameters are required to run the model, whose values are determined by the mathematical model. Thus, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref> indicates the value of the mathematical model variables used in the system dynamics model.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab8"><label>Table 8</label><caption><p>Determined parameters of the system dynamics model based on the mathematical model.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:66,212.6,537.1,388.6"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p>A cause-and-effect diagram is created according to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Fig. 5</xref>, based on the values in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref> and the solution of the mathematical model in the system dynamics model.</p>
<fig id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Cause and effect diagram of the present study.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:14:66,527.6,537.1,725.4"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Fig. 6</xref> shows that the per capita consumption rate is multiplied by the area&apos;s population, and the resulting value is the consumption. The amount of input water, along with precipitation, constitutes the total amount of water in the area. Finally, the amount of shortage is determined based on the amount of treated water and the amount of waste. To clarify the results, the flow storage diagram is presented based on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Fig. 6</xref>.</p>
<fig id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Current flow storage diagram of the present study.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:14:66,238.1,537.1,450.1"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Fig. 7</xref>, the cause-and-effect relationships are presented in a quantitative diagram used to forecast the level of shortage. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Fig. 7</xref> shows the final results of the shortage for the next 100 years in Guilan province. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Fig. 7</xref> shows that the amount of shortage in the studied area will follow a linear trend during the next 100 years. In each period, the shortage increases with population growth and decreasing precipitation in the area. However, this increase does not follow an exponential distribution, and the amount of shortage can be expected in the studied area, given increases in population and precipitation.</p>
<fig id="fig7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Forecasting the amount of shortage.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:15:66,553.4,537.1,778.9"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-21"><label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The present study aimed to optimize and plan the urban water supply system using bi-objective optimization and system dynamics method, and the case study was the Water and Wastewater Organization in Guilan province. For this purpose, library studies were conducted, and research gaps were identified based on these studies. The proposed method in this study was to provide a hybrid model of mathematical modeling, meta-heuristic algorithms, and system dynamics approach. The decision variables, including the amount of water resources in the reservoir, the amount of treated water in the water treatment system, the amount of wastewater in the area, and the amount of water shortage in the area, along with the amounts of the objective functions, were obtained using the mathematical model and meta-heuristic algorithm. Then, the amounts were entered into the system dynamics model as input values, and the shortage in future periods was predicted, indicating a linear trend of up to more than 520 thousand units. In addition, the sensitivity analysis shows the reverse effects of capacity and the amount of input water, and the direct effects of transmission cost, energy consumption, energy consumption cost, treatment cost, resource cost, construction cost, and demand. Among the parameters with a direct effect on energy consumption cost, construction cost, and treatment cost, construction cost has the most significant effect on supply cost. In contrast, treatment costs and demand have the most tremendous impact on shortages and wastewater in the system.</p>
<p>Based on the findings, the most significant suggestions for managers as a roadmap for the future are as follows: increasing treatment capacity and water resources in Guilan province can reduce treatment costs and alleviate shortages and wastewater. Thus, increasing investment to enhance treatment capacity and water resources is one of the approaches to prevent shortages and control wastewater, given the abundant water resources in Guilan province. Although the investment can be expensive in the short term, it prevents increases in costs and emerging water shortages in the long term. Regarding parameters that have a positive effect, such as the amount of non-precipitation water entering Guilan province from other provinces, appropriate measures should be taken through various methods to increase the province&apos;s water resources. In this regard, using input water can offer more advantages than using rainwater. If the right systems are used and managed effectively to control water inputs, an increase in water resources can be expected, resulting in reduced costs and wastewater in Guilan province. Energy consumption control is one of the factors that strongly affects the cost. Using devices with lower energy consumption can help treat and maintain water sources. Construction costs are considered an essential cost factor. Using existing resources appropriately and constructing new facilities can significantly affect costs. Demand is considered a significant factor in creating a shortage in the present model. The effect of demand on cost is not as significant as that of other parameters, though it can definitely affect shortages and wastewater. In this regard, acculturation regarding consumption and optimized consumption through the use of construction tools and valves can increase demand. Furthermore, presenting and analyzing the present model in the low-water provinces of Iran such as Yazd and Kerman, using more decision variables and parameters in the mathematical model, applying multiple meta-heuristic algorithms and comparing their performance, considering the uncertainty in some parameters such as the demand for wastewater, and using the system dynamics tool to predict the situation in the long term are considered as the most critical suggestions for the development of the present study in future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-22"><title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to all individuals whose valuable comments and support contributed to the successful completion of this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-23"><title>Funding</title>
<p>This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-24"><title>Data Availability</title>
<p>The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="ref-1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ghannem, S., Bergillos, R. J., Paredes-Arquiola, J., Martínez-Capel, F., &amp; Andreu, J. (2023). Coupling hydrological, habitat and water supply indicators to improve the management of environmental flows. Science of The Total Environment, 898, 165640. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165640">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165640</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Tian, Y., Li, C., Yi, Y., Wang, X., &amp; Shu, A. (2020). Dynamic model of a sustainable water resources utilization system with coupled water quality and quantity in Tianjin city. Sustainability, 12(10), 4254. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104254">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104254</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Parween, S., &amp; Sinha, R. C. (2023). Identification of indicators for developing an integrated study on urban water supply system, planning, and management. Journal of environmental engineering, 149(3), 4022095. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7062">https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7062</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Nezami, N., Zarghami, M., Tizghadam, M., &amp; Abbasi, M. (2022). A novel hybrid systemic modeling into sustainable dynamic urban water metabolism management: Case study. Sustainable cities and society, 85, 104065. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104065">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104065</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Demirel, D. F., Gönül-Sezer, E. D., &amp; Pehlivan, S. A. (2022). Analyzing the wastewater treatment facility location network design problem via system dynamics: Antalya, Turkey case. Journal of environmental management, 320, 115814. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115814">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115814</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Shiu, H. Y., Lee, M., Lin, Z. E., &amp; Chiueh, P. T. (2023). Dynamic life cycle assessment for water treatment implications. Science of the total environment, 860, 160224. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160224">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160224</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>de Melo, M. C., Formiga Johnsson, R. M., de Azevedo, J. P. S., de Oliveira Nascimento, N., Machado, F. L. V., Pacheco, F. A. L., &amp; Fernandes, L. F. S. (2021). A raw water security risk model for urban supply based on failure mode analysis. Journal of hydrology, 593, 125843. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125843">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125843</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Golpîra, H., &amp; Tirkolaee, E. B. (2019). Stable maintenance tasks scheduling: A bi-objective robust optimization model. Computers &amp; industrial engineering, 137, 106007. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106007</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Nepal, S., &amp; Tran, L. T. (2019). Identifying trade-offs between socio-economic and environmental factors for bioenergy crop production: A case study from northern Kentucky. Renewable energy, 142, 272–283. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.110">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.110</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Song, W., Liu, Y., Arowolo, A., Zhang, Y., &amp; Xu, Q. (2019). Optimal water allocation scheme in integrated water-ecosystem-economy system. In River basin management (pp. 333–360). Springer Singapore. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6949-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6949-9</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Tian, J., Guo, S., Liu, D., Pan, Z., &amp; Hong, X. (2019). A fair approach for multi-objective water resources allocation. Water resources management, 33(10), 3633–3653. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02325-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02325-5</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Z., Yao, L., &amp; Chen, X. (2020). Urban water supply system optimization and planning: Bi-objective optimization and system dynamics methods. Computers &amp; industrial engineering, 142, 106373. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106373">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106373</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Y., Zhao, R., Zhang, J., Yang, D., &amp; Zhou, T. (2021). Multi-objective game theory optimization for balancing economic, social and ecological benefits in the Three Gorges Reservoir operation. Environmental research letters, 16(8), 85007. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0b69">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0b69</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Deng, L., Guo, S., Yin, J., Zeng, Y., &amp; Chen, K. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of water resources allocation in Han River basin (China) integrating efficiency, equity and sustainability. Scientific reports, 12(1),</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-15"><label>798</label><mixed-citation><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04734-2">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04734-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-16"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gilani, H., Shobeiry, S., Biglari Kami, M., &amp; Sahebi, H. (2023). A sustainable redesign model for the water-waste-water supply network: A water--energy nexus approach. Kybernetes, 52(5), 1842–1860. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2021-0320">https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2021-0320</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-17"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Z. (2023). Water-climate change extended nexus contribution to social welfare and environment-related sustainable development goals in China. Environmental science and pollution research, 30(14), 40654–40669. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25145-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25145-y</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-18"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Heydari Kushalshah, T., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., &amp; Abolghasemian, M. (2023). Hybrid modelling for urban water supply system management based on a bi-objective mathematical model and system dynamics: A case study in Guilan province. Journal of industrial and systems engineering, 15(1), 260–279. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17358272.2023.15.1.12.4">https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17358272.2023.15.1.12.4</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-19"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Heydari Kushalshah, T., Daneshmand-Mehr, M. A. (2021). Presenting a mathematical modeling and system dynamics for the supply chain of urban water security in Guilan province. Journal of water and soil conservation, 31(2), 1–31. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22069/jwsc.2024.21920.3694">https://doi.org/10.22069/jwsc.2024.21920.3694</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-20"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Pirouz, B., &amp; Khorram, E. (2016). A computational approach based on the $varepsilon$-constraint method in multi-objective optimization problems. Advanced applied statistics, 49(6), 453–483. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311550947">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311550947</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-21"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Abolghasemian, M., Darabi, H., &amp; others. (2018). Simulation based optimization of haulage system of an open-pit mine: Meta modeling approach. Organizational resources management researches, 8(2), 1–17. )In Persian). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.sid.ir/paper/373514/en">https://www.sid.ir/paper/373514/en</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-22"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Abolghasemian, M., Ghane Kanafi, A., &amp; Daneshmandmehr, M. (2020). A two-phase simulation-based optimization of hauling system in open-pit mine. Interdisciplinary journal of management studies (formerly known as iranian journal of management studies), 13(4), 705–732. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2020.294809.673898">https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2020.294809.673898</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-23"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Abolghasemian, M., Kanafi, A. G., &amp; Daneshmand-Mehr, M. (2022). Simulation-based multiobjective optimization of open-pit mine haulage system: A modified-NBI method and meta modeling approach. Complexity, 2022(1), 3540736. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3540736">https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3540736</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>