An Ideal-Point Goal Programming Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Ranking Productivity and Agility Improvement Enablers in the Ports and Maritime Organization

Authors

  • Mojtaba Bakhshandeh Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran.
  • Yahya Zare Mehrjerdi * Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-4985
  • Hassan Khademi Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.vi.101

Abstract

Extended project completion times and increased final costs of products and services are indicative of deficiencies in organizational productivity and agility when responding to environmental changes. Enhancing these two capabilities can significantly reduce the cost of organizational outcomes. One of the most effective approaches for simultaneously evaluating and improving productivity and agility is Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); however, conventional DEA models generally suffer from limited discriminatory power. To address this limitation, the present study proposes an ideal-point-based model that integrates DEA with Goal Programming (GP). Using a multi-criteria set of evaluation factors, DEA is employed to assess relative efficiency, while GP is utilized to incorporate preference structures for prioritization. Ideal and anti-ideal reference points are introduced to enhance the Model's discriminatory capability. The primary objective of this research is to identify and prioritize the key enablers of productivity and agility improvement within the Ports and Maritime Organization through the proposed Model. The research methodology consists of four stages and was implemented based on expert judgments from the organization. The proposed mathematical Model incorporates project execution time and cost as input criteria, and the impacts of enablers on four organizational dimensions—efficiency, effectiveness, flexibility, and responsiveness—as output criteria. The Model was applied to fourteen identified enablers, resulting in the prioritization of five key enablers: enhancement of systems thinking capability within the organization, implementation of project portfolio management, implementation of business process management, implementation of project risk management, and deployment of business intelligence systems. The principal contribution of this study is the development of an ideal-point goal programming DEA model, which, according to the conducted analyses, demonstrates superior discriminatory power and ranking quality compared with existing alternative models. The proposed framework assists managers in allocating resources to enablers with the greatest potential impact on organizational productivity and agility, while also providing policymakers with a valuable decision-support tool for strategic planning. As a practical implication, the study recommends integrating the proposed Model into a comprehensive organizational productivity cycle to facilitate the continuous and simultaneous improvement of productivity and agility.

Keywords:

Productivity, Organizational agility, Enabler, Data envelopment analysis, Goal programming , Ideal-point goal programming data envelopment analysis model

References

  1. [1] Golabchi, M., Yousefi, S., & Forozanfar, M. (2012). Examining the components of project-oriented organizations. The Third International Construction Industry Conference. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/173825/
  2. [2] Kwak, Y. H., Liu, M., Patanakul, P., Zwikael, O., & Allison, G. T. (2014). Challenges and best practices of managing government projects and programs. A Summary Of New Research For Reflective Practitioners. Project Management Institute (PMI). https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/kas/201410_kwak_challenges_best_practices.pdf
  3. [3] Clardy, A. (2013). A general framework for performance management systems: Structure, design, and analysis. Performance Improvement, 52(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21324
  4. [4] Temsks Bidgoli, M., Noori, S., & Babakhani, M. (2011). Measuring and analyzing partial and total factor productivity (TFP) of the country’s textile manufacturing industries. The Third National Textile and Apparel Conference. Yazd, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/114549/
  5. [5] Ghorbani, A., Ghorbani, A., & Arsalan Bad, M. R. (2016). The role of productivity in organizational excellence and economic development of countries. The 6th National Conference on Management, Economics and Accounting. Tabriz, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/599751/
  6. [6] Ghavi bazoo, T., Shekari., Gh., & Sahebi, M. H. (2014). Investigating the impact of improving and increasing productivity in the economy and its role in the country’s resilience economy and presenting a resilience model for the resilience economy. National Conference on Strategic Analysis of the Supreme Leader’s Views on Economy and Management Economic Epic / Resistance Economy. Babol, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/345961/
  7. [7] Jahanbazi Gojani, M. (2017). Presenting a methodology for developing agility strategies using swot and the network analysis process. International Conference on Applied Management and Organizational Agility, Tehran. Iran. Civilica. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/661095/
  8. [8] Ahmadzadeh Kandi, N., Hashemi, S. S., & Razavi Haji Agha, S. H. (2016). The impact of downsizing on organizational learning culture and agility in knowledge-based companies. National Conference on Organizational Culture. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/668338/
  9. [9] Gashtasb, A., & Ghazifar, S. A. (2017). Knowledge management and organizational agility. The Second International Conference on Sociocultural Studies and Religious Research. Rasht, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/659634/
  10. [10] Mohammadlou, A., Barzamini, S., & Khazir, M. (2016). Developing lean and agile automotive suppliers manufactures supply chain. African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management, 21(5), 1–11. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2901055
  11. [11] Abedini, A. A., & Amir Dalir Bonab, Y. (2016). Application of erp in the management of the electricity distribution company (Case study of the east Azerbaijan electricity distribution company in bonab county(. The Fourth International Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting.Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/567981/
  12. [12] Majidian, N. (2017). The impact of business intelligence on organizational agility using the q method (a qualitative study). National Humanities Conference. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/653482/
  13. [13] GhalichKhani, R. D., & Hakkak, M. (2016). A Model for measuring the direct and indirect impact of business intelligence on organizational agility with partial mediatory role of empowerment (Case study: Tehran construction engineering organization (TCEO) and ETKA Organization Industries. company). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.052
  14. [14] Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Agile manufacturing: Framework and its empirical validation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(9), 2147–2157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6455-6
  15. [15] Khatri, A., Garg, D., & Dangayach, G. S. (2018). Modelling of prime agile enablers: People, virtual integration and information technology. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.068
  16. [16] Bahrami, M. A., Kiani, M. M., Montazeralfaraj, R., Zadeh, H. F., & Zadeh, M. M. (2016). The mediating role of organizational learning in the relationship of organizational intelligence and organizational agility. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 7(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2016.04.007
  17. [17] Mehdibeigi, N., Dehghani, M., & mohammad Yaghoubi, N. (2016). Customer knowledge management and organization’s effectiveness: Explaining the mediator role of organizational agility. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.012
  18. [18] Saeedi, N., Kazemi, M., & Lagzian, M. (2016). Identifying the elements affecting the establishment of knowledge management in project-oriented organizations. The Second International Conference on Industrial and Systems Engineering (ICISE). Mashhad, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/540366/
  19. [19] Haji Ali Akbar, M. (2008). The role and position of value methodologies in the excellence of project-oriented organizations. The Third National Value Engineering Conference. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/52448/
  20. [20] Shojaei, M., & Vedadii, A. (2017). Critical success factors in project-oriented organizations (case study, ICT companies). Social Crisis Management, 7(27), 83–102. https://jms.ihu.ac.ir/article_201964.html
  21. [21] Mohaqeqhi, V., & Mousavi, S. . (2014). Providing a framework for decision support in project portfolio management with a sustainable development approach. The First International Conference on Management Tools And Techniques. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/476865/
  22. [22] Rabiei Sarvandi, N. (2022). How can we create productivity by creating systems thinking in government managers? an approach based on critical systems understanding. International Conference on Dynamics and Systems Thinking. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1595556/
  23. [23] Adeoye, A. O., & Odusanya, K. S. (2022). Effects of business process management on organisational productivity: A study of selected banks. EuroEconomica, 41(1), 90–100. https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/EE/article/view/1691
  24. [24] Khan, S. A., Kaviani, M. A., J. Galli, B., & Ishtiaq, P. (2019). Application of continuous improvement techniques to improve organization performance: A case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(2), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2017-0048
  25. [25] Nawaz, A., Waqar, A., Shah, S. A. R., Sajid, M., & Khalid, M. I. (2019). An innovative framework for risk management in construction projects in developing countries: Evidence from Pakistan. Risks, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7010024
  26. [26] Nyandongo, K. M., & Lubisi, J. (2019). Assessing the use of project management information systems and its impact on project outcome. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Pilsen, Czech Republic. (pp. 1501-1512). IEOM Society International. http://ieomsociety.org/pilsen2019/papers/451.pdf
  27. [27] Bani Hashemi, S. A., Khalilzadeh, M., Shahraki, A., & Rostami Mal Khalifa, M. (2020). Evaluating the efficiency of project scheduling and planning: A data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outcomes. The 13th International Conference of the Iranian Operations Research Association. Semnan, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1124828/
  28. [28] Abedian, M., Safari, M., & Dabestani, M. (2019). Performance evaluation and prioritization of projects for project portfolio selection using interval data envelopment analysis method: Case study of Isfahan shahidan hojaji and shiroodi industries projects. The 7th Performance Evaluation Conference. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/974099/
  29. [29] Samoilenko, S., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2013). Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: Design and implementation of a decision support system. Omega, 41(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.010
  30. [30] Dengiz, B., Iç, Y. T., & Belgin, O. (2016). A meta-model based simulation optimization using hybrid simulation-analytical modeling to increase the productivity in automotive industry. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2015.07.005
  31. [31] Khanzadi, M., Nasirzad, F., & Mir, M. (2018). Productivity simulation using integration of system dynamics simulation and agent-based modeling approaches. Sharif Civil Engineering Journal, 34–2(1–1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2018.1325
  32. [32] Mirahadi, F., & Zayed, T. (2016). Simulation-based construction productivity forecast using neural-network-driven fuzzy reasoning. Automation in Construction, 65, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.021
  33. [33] Mehrgan, M. M. (2004). Quantitative models in organizational performance evaluation. Faculty of Management, University of Tehran. (In Persian). https://www.gisoom.com/book/11574194
  34. [34] Eslami Bidgoli, GH., & Telangi, A. (1999). Goal planning models in optimal portfolio selection. Financial Research Journal, 4(13), 50-71. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.10248153.1378.4.13.4.2
  35. [35] Makuei, A., Alinezhad, A., Kiani, M. R., & Zohrehbandian, M. (2008). A goal programming method for finding common weights in DEA with an improved discriminating power for efficiency. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1(4), 293–303. (In Persian). https://www.jise.ir/article_3940_3fa146219c48a4393aace23e8f353125.pdf
  36. [36] Morovati Sharifabadi, A., Tahari Mehrjerdi, M. H., & Azargoon, M. (2011). Presenting an ideal planning model for evaluating the performance of public libraries in the country’s provinces. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 7(1), 1-41. (In Persian). https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699117_29df92afe5883200ab9559ac4f7826fb.pdf?lang=en
  37. [37] Razavi, H. S. H., Hashemi, S. S., & Amoozad, M. H. (2014). DEA with common set of weights based on a multi objective fractional programming problem. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 25(3), 207–214. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/638054/en
  38. [38] Martin, D. H., Kocher, G., & Sutter, M. (2004). Measuring efficeincy of German football teams by DEA. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 12(3), 251–268. https://search.proquest.com/openview/ed228c066266fe82e7a935ee303bf1e6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=46921
  39. [39] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  40. [40] Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a: Statistics in Society, 120(3), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  41. [41] Khezrimotlagh, D., Salleh, S., & Mohsenpour, Z. (2012). Benchmarking inefficient decision making units in DEA. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(12), 12056–12065. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dariush-Khezrimotlagh/publication/235907242_Benchmarking_Inefficient_Decision_Making_Units_in_DEA/links/557853fd08ae75363755b09e/Benchmarking-Inefficient-Decision-Making-Units-in-DEA.pdf
  42. [42] Sadooghi, M. R. (2020). Evaluating the performance of tejarat bank branches with a fuzzy approach and data envelopment analysis method. The Second International Conference on Innovation in Business Management and Economics. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1121155/
  43. [43] Farooghi, H., & Mousavipour, S. H. (2015). Selecting and measuring the performance of an enterprise resource planning system in the banking industry using data envelopment analysis. 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/516028/
  44. [44] Rahimi javid, E., & Akbari, M. (2021). Analyzing the effects of administrative automation on the efficiency and effectiveness (productivity) of affairs in public and private organizations and departments. The 11th National Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran, Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1453807/
  45. [45] Eidi, A., & Aziri, B. (2021). Presenting a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model (relational networks) for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of the banking system. Bimonthly Commercial Surveys, 19(108), 75-88. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/bs.2021.247062
  46. [46] Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK(R). PMI Standard. https://www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok
  47. [47] Shukor, A. A., Newz, M. Sh., Rahman, M. Kh., & Taha, A. Z. (2021). Supply chain integration and its impact on supply chain agility and organizational flexibility in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1721–1744. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2020-0418
  48. [48] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  49. [49] Kao, C., & Hung, H. T. (2005). Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924

Downloads

Published

2026-12-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bakhshandeh, M. ., Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. ., & Khademi , H. . (2026). An Ideal-Point Goal Programming Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Ranking Productivity and Agility Improvement Enablers in the Ports and Maritime Organization. Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.vi.101

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.