Open Access Articles

From Theory to Practice: Leveraging DEA and MCDA for Robust Composite Indicator Frameworks in Sustainable Development

Authors

Davoud Nejatpour Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abdollah Hadi Vencheh * Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali Jamshidi Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v1i2.44

Downloads

Abstract

This study elucidates a novel methodological framework that synergizes Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to critically assess and enhance composite indicator systems in the realm of sustainable development. Through meticulous application to two pivotal sectors in Iran water resource management and renewable energy utilization we demonstrate the framework’s capacity to generate empirical insights that inform policy-making and strategic resource allocation. Utilizing DEA, we quantitatively evaluate the relative efficiencies of these sectors across various provinces, highlighting significant discrepancies in performance outcomes. The results indicate that Tehran attains the foremost efficiency score in renewable energy utilization, underscoring its effective harnessing of resources relative to other provinces. This research not only advances the theoretical discourse surrounding DEA and MCDA integration but also provides a pragmatic template for evaluating sustainability initiatives. By fostering a deeper understanding of operational efficiencies and inefficiencies, the framework developed herein has the potential to guide effective decision-making processes aimed at achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Iran and analogous contexts worldwide.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis Multi-criteria decision analysis Composite indicator Sustainability

References (28)

[1] Union, E., & Centre, J. R. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD. https://B2n.ir/gd8983

[2] LINE, A. O. N. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. https://B2n.ir/xd9754

[3] Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD. https://B2n.ir/jx4759

[4] Martín-Gamboa, M., Iribarren, D., García-Gusano, D., & Dufour, J. (2017). A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.017

[5] Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European journal of operational research, 264(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023

[6] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European journal of operational research, 3(4), 1–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

[7] Sarrico, C. S. (2001). Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Journal of the operational research society, 52(12), 1408–1409. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601257

[8] Cook, W. D. (2001). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer. 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8

[9] Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K., & others. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (Vol. 2). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109347

[10] Kohl, S., Schoenfelder, J., Fügener, A., & Brunner, J. O. (2019). The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health care management science, 22, 245–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8

[11] Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W.-M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.11.004

[12] Zhang, J., Wu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2019). A two-stage DEA model for resource allocation in industrial pollution treatment and its application in China. Journal of cleaner production, 228, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.141

[13] Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.052

[14] Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer science & business media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4

[15] Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046

[16] Cicciù, B., Schramm, F., & Schramm, V. B. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making/aid methods for assessing agricultural sustainability: A literature review. Environmental science & policy, 138, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.09.020

[17] Pelissari, R., Khan, S. A., & Ben-Amor, S. (2022). Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in sustainable manufacturing management: a systematic literature review and analysis of the prospects. International journal of information technology & decision making, 21(02), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622021300020

[18] Azhar, N. A., Radzi, N. A. M., & Wan Ahmad, W. S. H. M. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making: a systematic review. Recent advances in electrical & electronic engineering (formerly recent patents on electrical & electronic engineering), 14(8), 779–801. https://doi.org/10.2174/2352096514666211029112443

[19] Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11032

[20] Shao, Q., Weng, S. S., Liou, J. J. H., Lo, H. W., & Jiang, H. (2019). Developing a sustainable urban-environmental quality evaluation system in China based on a hybrid model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(8), 1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081434

[21] Arabi, B., Toloo, M., Yang, Z., Zhang, P., & Xu, B. (2024). Sustainable refrigeration technology selection: An innovative DEA-TOPSIS hybrid model. Environmental science & policy, 158, 103780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103780

[22] Kandakoglu, A., Frini, A., & Ben Amor, S. (2019). Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review. Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 26(5–6), 202–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1682

[23] Wang, H. (2015). A generalized MCDA-DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis-data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator. Energy, 80, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.051

[24] Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability science, 13, 1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3

[25] Alexandra T,. Margaret J., & Amanda, J. (2021). Key performance indicators (KPIs) https://B2n.ir/fb1246

[26] Martič, M. M., Novakovič, M. S., & Baggia, A. (2009). Data envelopment analysis-basic models and their utilization. Organizacija, Sciendo. 42(2). 37-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10051-009-0001-6

[27] Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index. Journal of the operational research society, 59(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445

[28] Ngor, P.Y., Masrom, S.N., & Rani, R.M. (2023). Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) and Banker, Chames and Cooper Data Envelopment Analysis (BCC-DEA) Models in Improving the Allocation Officers in Outpatient Department. Engineering, Agriculture, Science and Technology Journal (EAST-J). https://doi.org/10.37698/eastj.v2i1.205

Article Metrics

Published 2024-08-29
Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Section Articles
Views 0
Downloads 0

How to Cite

Nejatpour, D., Hadi Vencheh, A. ., & Jamshidi, A. (2024). From Theory to Practice: Leveraging DEA and MCDA for Robust Composite Indicator Frameworks in Sustainable Development. Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v1i2.44

Download Citation

Similar Articles

Mojtaba Bakhshandeh, Yahya Zare Mehrjerdi, Hassan Khademi , An Ideal-Point Goal Programming Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Ranking Productivity and Agility Improvement Enablers in the Ports and Maritime Organization , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Eisa Abdolmaleki, Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah, Mohammad Taghi Yahyapour, Zahra Joorbonyan, Fractional Order Efficiency: A New DEA Paradigm Based on Memory Dependent Dynamics , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Alireza Yazdanpanah, Sensitivity Analysis of Inefficient Decision-Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with a Focus on Boilers: A Case Study , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Saeede Maleki, Seyed Esmaeil Najafi, Zohreh Moghaddas, Evaluating the Performance of Production Lines Using Expanded Data Envelopment Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and Entropy in a Grey Environment (Case Study: Kaleh Company) , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Nematollah Naderizadeh, Javad Gerami, Mohammad Reza Mozaffari, Atefeh Amindoust, Mohammad Reza Feylizadeh, A Centralized Resource Allocation Model for Improving Industrial Performance Using Inverse Network DEA (Case Study: Fars & Khuzestan Cement Holding Company) , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Mohammad Malekraeisi, Ali Akbar Kiani, Hamid Saadatfar, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adaptive Intrusion Detection Systems under Detection Uncertainty , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Khadijeh Ghaziani, Mohammad Koloukhi, A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework Based on the PROMETHEE Method for Selecting Support Service Providers in Governmental Organizations (Case Study: Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs) , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Mohammad Zandieh Shirazi, Nasim Ghodrati, Prioritizing Marketing Mix Components (7P) with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods (Case Study: Abyek Cement Company, Alborz Province) , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Javad Gerami, Masoumeh Raeiszadeh, Allocation of Fixed Costs in the Presence of Production Trade-offs in Data Envelopment Analysis , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Saeid Abbassbandy, Nima Hashemi Germezi, Data Envelopment Analysis with Indices of Time Dependent , Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering

1-10 of 60 Next

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.