Risk Management Framework for Super Adobe Hotel Construction Projects: A Comprehensive Case Study Analysis

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v2i4.93

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive risk management framework specifically designed for Super adobe hotel construction projects. Super adobe, a sustainable building technique utilizing soil-filled polypropylene bags, entails unique risks compared to conventional construction methods. This study develops a systematic approach, grounded in ISO 31000 risk management principles, to identify, assess, and mitigate risks in an 80-room Super adobe hotel project. The framework encompasses categories of structural, financial, operational, strategic, marketing, health and safety, tourism, environmental sustainability, and legal/regulatory risks. A total of 53 distinct risks were identified and classified using a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS). Risk assessment was conducted through probability–impact matrices and quantitative financial impact analysis, revealing potential financial risks exceeding USD 20 million. The study proposes practical risk response strategies, including mitigation, avoidance, transfer, and acceptance approaches. Early warning indicators and monitoring systems are established to ensure effective risk control throughout the project life cycle. This research contributes to the limited literature on risk management for sustainable construction projects and provides a replicable framework for similar developments in the field of eco-tourism.

Keywords:

Risk management, Project management, Super adobe, Earthbag construction, sustainable hotels, ISO 31000

References

  1. [1] Baratsas, V., & Tzavaras, P. (2023). Risk management practice in the tourism and hospitality industry. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on management, economics and finance. prague: Czech republic. erişim tarihi (Vol. 2, p. 2025). https://doi.org/10.33422/6th.icmef.2023.03.002
  2. [2] Walker, P., Keable, R., Martin, J., & Maniatidis, V. (2005). Rammed earth: design and construction guidelines. http://www.brebookshop.com/details.jsp?id=146813
  3. [3] Carrobé, A., Castell, A., & Martorell, I. (2024). Life cycle assessment comparison between an earthbag building and a conventional sahrawi cement blocks building. Materials, 17(5), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051011
  4. [4] Mills, A. (2001). A systematic approach to risk management for construction. Structural survey, 19(5), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800110412615
  5. [5] Miccoli, L., Müller, U., & Fontana, P. (2014). Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Construction and building materials, 61, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009
  6. [6] Easton, D., & Wright, C. (2007). The rammed earth house. Chelsea Green Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HVLPAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=
  7. [7] Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International journal of project management, 15(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
  8. [8] Raz, T., & Hillson, D. (2005). A comparative review of risk management standards. Risk management, 7(4), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240227%0A%0A
  9. [9] Bednarska, M. (2004). Risk control methods in a hotel operation. Economics and business review, 4(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2004.1.502
  10. [10] Fenech, N. (2006). Managing risks within international hotel construction projects. University of London, University College London (United Kingdom). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319035329
  11. [11] Song, J., Munyinda, M., & Adu Sarfo, P. (2025). Examining the impact of risk management practices on sustainable project performance in the construction industry: The role of stakeholder engagement. Frontiers in built environment, 11, 1575827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1575827
  12. [12] Jokar, S., Shojaei, P., Askarifar, K., & Haqbin, A. (2024). Investigating social risks of construction projects in historic tourism sites in urban districts of developing countries: social network analysis approach. International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 36(2), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2022-0282
  13. [13] Starczyk-Kołbyk, A., & Jędras, I. (2025). Integrated risk assessment in construction contracts: comparative evaluation of risk matrix and Monte Carlo simulation on a high-rise office building project. Applied sciences, 15(17), 9371. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179371
  14. [14] Guide, P. M. B. O. K. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. https://books.google.com/books/about/A_Guide_to_the_Project_Management_Body_o.html?id=KlNgPgAACAAJ
  15. [15] El-Sayegh, S. M., & Mansour, M. H. (2015). Risk assessment and allocation in highway construction projects in the UAE. Journal of management in engineering, 31(6), 4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000365
  16. [16] Muzorewa, M. (2024). Project management strategies used in hospitality construction projects to improve performance [Thesis]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=16662&context=dissertations

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ghobadi, N. ., & Fattah, M. . (2025). Risk Management Framework for Super Adobe Hotel Construction Projects: A Comprehensive Case Study Analysis. Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2(4), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v2i4.93

Similar Articles

21-27 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.